RE: Debian/Ubuntu: apt versus apt-get

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Debian/Ubuntu: apt versus apt-get

in blog •  7 years ago 

I used to use aptitude more than apt-get because it automatically cleans obsolete packages for you and it combines a number of apt-* commands.

But apt-get was always the recommended tool by Debian, especially when doing a dist-upgrade.

I think apt was introduced in Debian Stretch and I've been using that for a while now. I like its ouput more than the other tools, but unfortunately it doesn't jave all the commands and options yet.

So I keep switching between apt and apt-*, but no aptitude anymore. I've been using Debian for 15 years now, so it's no problem for me but I can imagine it can scare new users.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

When I first tried linux, it was thanks to Caldera Linux (if memory serves right) in 2002. To be honest, I was so afraid of it, that I didn't touch linux again until 2007 with Ubuntu 6.10!

aptitude is scary to be honest, I've had to reinstall Ubuntu 5 times in a week, because I didn't know what I was doing xD

But thankfully, I picked up a book and a lot of tutorials over the net, and 10 years later I can say "thanks for apt" and "thanks for apt-get"!

Thanks for taking part :)