An important week for Brexit progress
This has been a big week for Brexit. First, Teresa could has finally terminated her affect the DUP – at some value, however low cost at [*fr1] the worth – which alliance has survived its initial crucial check in Parliament.
Meanwhile, our Brexit interpreter Gerard Batten has raised the stakes by starting off ‘all guns blazing’ with a radical set up for the negotiations, one which is able to notice favour with an excellent several UKIP members.
Reiterating the ‘Six Tests for Brexit’, Gerard calls on Mrs May's government to regain the initiative when her calamitous election by repealing the 1972 European Communities Act and ditching the Article fifty method. He goes on to mention that following the ‘Great Repeal Act’ (which is not any such thing) the govt ought to begin straight off on emergency unilateral action to repeal or amend all laws that aren't within the British national interest.
they should simply hand back the book of dictated legislations and repeal anything that was enacted from those dictates, then we should collapse the channel tunnel and have the army stationed at all ports so we can leave without issue but getting back in is a diff matter.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
if i'm brutally honest we should just leave the EU, don't haggle just leave. the channel tunnel is slightly different i like the idea of being able to get to Europe by train. it's just a different way of getting to europe. just like by going by ferry or flying.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
We have less than 12 months and we are out under the common law, I have always been against the tunnel as it ties us to the continent which could be construed as an extension to the continent, for us to be truly free from that cesspit I honestly believe the tunnel needs to go. It's not like it is even cost effective, last time I compared, it was £120 for a day trip via the tunnel, or £28 via a ferry, OK granted the tunnel is faster than the ferry but it doesn't justify the exorbitant expense for me. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
true the money isn't worth it. but it wouldn't be worth it to just destroy it. god knows how much it would cost to implode it. can't wait for what elton musk has got in store with his hyper loop idea.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I could implode it on less than £100 using the same dynamite that they use when demolishing buildings or blasting out mines, id then sell the trains for scrap metal, none of us need to be able to get around at such stupid speeds, only slaves need to be able to get around so fast as they are always chasing their next slave master, i don't want to assist the continuation of enabling these silly slaves. The only thing worse than 1 idiot with an idea is a collective of idiots all touting the same brainless idea's :(
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit