Short Position

Hodlers have been

The price of Bitcoin and other cryptoconces is a good thing, do not care about an ear about technology, blockchain, behind this cryptococurrence and make a profit not only flush out all the commentators.

The above statement is not about cryptococcurrent investment or promotion, a wealth class that still walks on the wild side.

But for legitimate blockchain projects, these are encouraging people to invest in technology and to make payment systems more effective or to move forward the possible limitations of closing the gap of discrimination in different aspects of life.

Like any kind of investment, people have to understand how they invest. Encouraging this year, especially for cryptocoarb, year after year, especially for cryptoscups like Bitcoin, Atomium, Light Cone or Wave.

But the instability of the price betrays the loss of investors' understanding of this digital asset and it is bad. The media controllers blame the Facebook, Google and Twitter preferences of pressing for banning ads for currency printing, a form of crowd execution for blockchain-based projects.

And scholars are saying that, rebounding prices or the possibility of recovery is slim, saying it again. However, if anyone has noticed before, it will return once the Bitcoin price drops, and the more exciting that the level is.

Because of that, reducing the price of each time, FOMO (missing out of fear) goes into the opposite gear of the crowd, and starts to sell fears that the stratospheric levels may be lower than the price after pushing them by, especially in the end of last year

Asian trade fell Friday by almost 7,000 US dollars on Friday and the price has decreased slightly, it could be lower. Finally, it is hodlers, long-time investors, who understand the blockchain technology, who will retain their cryptouroemide

They are those people who will spread more education and knowledge on cryptographers and blockquenas.

Until then, beware of the FOMO crowd and their fads.

Who blinks first

IT is a question of this, what will be the first, Mad Voodoo's Sdn Bhd and its full-time advisor, Central Shore SDN Bhd, who jointly hold 50.07% of the MBM assets.
Or UMW Holdings Bodies

Which offers a buy to buy all the shares managed by Med-Weaver and Central Shore. Although Med-vandal and Central Shore rejected the UMW offer, the company's accreditation extension has been extended from March 23 to March 30. This allows them to change their minds, many believe that they will not.

UMW, a company that has been in Lalmonirhat for three years, has created a proposal to buy all common shares of MBM at RM501mil or RM2.56 per share held by Memo-Vamikar and Central Shore. An offer that is almost the entire value of the company around RM1bil.

The problem is that the offer is very low, and not even the main shareholders of MBM. The proposal only took into account 22.58% shares of Perumahan Automobile CadUA SDMHD (Perodaya) MBM, which is probably the main reason behind Umm's first purchase of the offer. Only stock prices worth RM950mil near

In addition to offering a buy-and-buy buyout in Central Shore, along with a proposal to purchase another 10% share of RM 417.5 milliliters in UMW parody, Prododan Nasiell Bhd. From its Private Equity Investment Index With the UMW currently a 38% share of the largest shareholder unit in paradise.

Both agreements will go through, UMW will effectively have 70.6% shares in Perodua, a company whose monthly monthly market sales has reached a record high January 40% in the market. Perodua has been the market leader for passenger cars over the years and a big part simply means more revenue for UMW.

In addition to MBM dealership in Volvo cars and trucks, there are some things to think about for Dihatsu and Hino Commercial Vehicles. UMW and Toyota and Lexus sell cars.

MBM's Auto Parts business and UMW's Manufacturing arm will have seniority, which also creates automotive components.

The people of Med-Voivir and Central Shore know this and keep it to a good deal.

Technology and competition

Technology innovations are meant to bring in better and cheap access to the benefits of functioning as well as all and the spontaneous services.

For example, financial technology (Fineech) revolution, there is a big focus on reaching extending business and we all know about the ride-hailing applications.

Grab and Uber started a journey for a passenger and in many cases is cheaper, in competition they consider the injection into the system. But now, they are asking themselves - Singapore's Competition Commission (CCS) is now saying that Grabe and Uber have violated the Competition Act, because it is "reasonable grounds".

CCS mentions that the merger for Singapore's private-house car industry can be "competition certificate low". That may be very good in that case.

Note that the first certificate is that the right direction is a big step for the CCC to come through this verdict. It is not being considered that long before the government and regulators questioned the validity of the company's existence as Graab and Uber

Secondly, it should be noted that the satisfaction of the competitive organization can be managed by these two companies to reduce the incidents of competitive conduct.

Then the way for them to go ahead with their margin will be created. Note, however, this is: If consumers feel that they are not getting a good deal from the GAB-UB company, then it can be invent new. Keep in mind that technological innovators constantly monitor the problem

Meanwhile, blockbuster enthusiasts believe that some applications like Grabs or Uber or Airbank have hampered some of the art, they have been motivated to disrupt themselves. This is because the blockbain protocol enables decentralization of everything in connection with the network with minimal, safe and effective way of communicating and interacting with each other.