RE: Twitter stopped shadow banning people they disagree with.

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Twitter stopped shadow banning people they disagree with.

in busy •  6 years ago  (edited)

Peak Centrism at play lmfao.

No the word is just not correct. Its actually genuinely impossible when using the definition of the word to be intolerant of intolerance.

noun: intolerance; plural noun: intolerances
unwillingness to accept views, beliefs, or behavior that differ from one's own.
"a struggle against religious intolerance"

Can we at least agree that the word is being used incorrectly. Because intolerant of intolerance means you have to be intolerant yourself which means you are not tolerant of your own beliefs.

Its literally impossible. Maybe change the word or something. Use different terminology or something. It doesn't work that way. Its illogical as hell. You cannot be intolerant of those who are intolerant. It does not work that way.

Please get out of the bubble and talk to more leftists or look at some more leftist philosophy lol, you're literally spewing a lot of the same garbage that I see people like Richard Spencer or Mike Cernovich say (two confirmed neo-nazis)

Well I am talking to one right now and you are not effective at getting me to agree with your side of the argument. When I see Nazis and antifa all I see are intolerant jackboot thugs who are butt hurt that the centrists wont side with them. That's all I see.

Also you just combined Cernovich with Spencer... They are not even remotely similar.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

If you want to win the debate on this topic, you should ask cyberdemon WHO did they help.
None of the examples provided was stuff she did herself.
Trying to help and then failing isn't the same thing as actually helping someone, which can basically describe these ideologies in a nutshell.
As they say... The road to Hell is paved in good intentions.

I mean, I guess I could kill people but it's ok so long as I donate a few bucks to charity, right?

Intolerant people in this example are bigots; people that have the express purpose to make minorities sad and want to see them erased from the world.

Being intolerant of those people is the rule. If you can't decipher context well enough to figure that out, well... that's just a bit strange.

"jackboot thugs" lol, because a few people get heated and hurt people, that means everyone with a leftist ideology is a thug? .... thinking emoji.

Nazis and fascists' core philosophies end-goals are to eradicate minorities. Antifa's end goal is to create a peaceful and loving society. Just because a few leftists punched a nazi or two, does't mean that the goals of the entire movement are different. It just means you have a problem with registering sample sizes.

Cernovich is an alt-right white supremacist who pushes labels of pedophilia onto people and doxes journalists for fun and with the express intent to get them harmed. He is literally the same style of person. If you can find me some evidence that cernovich isn't alt-right, feel free to link it. I've seen dozens, if not hundreds, of articles and tweets of his own admission, and videos of him spewing this nonsense.

Loading...