Decentralized Business, Challenging, Hard to Predict

in busy •  6 years ago 

image from pixabay

The IDEA of decentralized businesses, is quite attractive

but in reality, it is painfully slow and seems unlikely to hold up to the pace that centralized businesses can move.

If you are building a currency, especially one that the governments of the world will not like it makes a lot of sense to have it spread about on many computers with no clear leaders to attack or prosecute. It works as the goals are pretty simple. Mining the tokens and distributing them is a pretty easy task. However, as soon as things quit scaling and business decisions need to be made on how to adjust the product, the problems begin. We can see this happening with Bitcoin and it's many, many forks. The silly antics of Roger Ver and the Bitcoin OGs.

Getting large groups of people without leaders to agree on a direction is like trying to herd cats or people. :) In most businesses, there is a small group of leaders who make the decisions and hand out directives and incentives to those who will help them meet defined goals. Those leaders can adjust the goals and directives to meet changing market conditions. Some within the organization may disagree, but it is always clear who is going to make the decision and those with differing opinions have to choose to either leave the company or get on board with the current direction.

In the case of rewarding content, there are many decisions to be made, While we also have a currency and a blockchain to manage, there are additional variables as well; how the rewards work, what to do about illegal activities, target markets, branding, upgrades to applications, how flagging should work, which coding changes will reach the blockchain and many many more.

The solution to those challenges regarding the Steem blockchain is SMTs. This solution will allow many products to make these decisions in different ways and see which ones are attractive and perhaps profitable. After all this time, I am still not entirely clear on how that ads value to the Steem currency. What it does achieve are smaller groups with Investors or Leaders to make decisions and develop different types of products that may favor different types of Content or other use cases. Each SMT can have different protocols on how they distribute their tokens, which facilitates different reward systems and values.

Rewarding Content Creators

Rewarding Content Creators is a difficult task that several companies have tried to take on, but eventually, most sites that try to reward content find that people just don't take money out of their wallet and hand it to another in exchange for reading a blog or listening to song, etc. Once voting power has monetary value, that is exactly what we are doing, it is a complex tipping system, but most have realized there is a monetary value in our votes and so voting for anyone else is essentially taking money out of your own pocket and handing it to someone else. How many posts here would you actually pay to read? In effect that is what we do when we vote for someone else's content. It is not a surprise to me that we are struggling with rewarding quality content and it is a problem we may not solve.

There is no question Steem has taken on a difficult task in a new economy, (crypto) and there are many times I wonder what on Earth I am thinking to spend so much time and energy on such a difficult model in a difficult environment. I can no longer claim to be rational when it comes to Steem though. I enjoy the community, I love the ideals, and I have put too much time in to walk away.

As An Investment

However, I am not at all sure that my investment here will grow. I watch as the bear market and sell pressure eats away at any monetary value my time here has created, and I get a little frustrated. DPOS ensures that skill sets or successful business ideas will hold no place in the near future as our large stakeholders are mostly miners and coin stackers vs. people who know how to build businesses. Many have an idea that large investors should get paid first, instead of putting in time and money to get money out later. My hope is SMTs and applications, may bring in more business minded people. I think the financial success of Steem currently is very much tied to the entire cryptocurrency market and hoping for pumps.

Benefits

We are providing a place for content creators to get rewarded though, and although it is awkward, I think many are making more here than they could possibly make elsewhere.

Although there are those who still flag over disagreement, we do allow for different viewpoints and unpopular opinions to be voiced and discussed.

I am most grateful for the education in cryptocurrency, and I do believe that P2P transactions will change the future of how we transact with each other financially, but it will likely go slowly and take time for the way we think about money and purchases to be a visible change.

The experiment has been amazing to watch and unfolded so differently than what I would have expected. Human behavior has always been of great interest to me and watching this community has given me a new appreciation of the challenges of Freedom. While we all have our own thoughts and ideas on how this should work, every single person here impacts every other person, the reward pool, the community and our futures. It's an interesting challenge.

I have no idea what this post is about...
@whatsup

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I think the financial success of Steem currently is very much tied to the entire cryptocurrency market and hoping for pumps.

Couldn't agree more, and that's a shame. There just needs to be more to do with Steem. Steem Monsters is sorta a good start, but we need more.

Right now, STEEM = the token on Steem... and nothing else. If we got more services offering a variety of digital & physical goods in exchange for direct STEEM, that's where we'll see a real change.

Thank god @dstors is helping with this.

Also, this might sound dumb / pretentious, but in regards to you wording this platform as an "experiment", I think we could all enjoy ourselves a lot more if we all viewed it that way.

"Am I gonna get rich? Will Steem go up? Can I get some upvotes?"
Part of me just wants to say: "Shutup and enjoy the ride!" lol

Posted using Partiko Android

Haha, the money gives it an interesting twist. yeah, I'm not planning on getting rich.

You're all gonna get rekt... lol, I've only put in a few hundred real life dollars, so I can't complain too much.

I demand you give the opening keynote at SteemFest 4:
"Hey, my name is whatsup, welcome to Steem, you're all gonna get rekt. Thank you."

Posted using Partiko Android

lol... :)

Getting large groups of people without leaders to agree on a direction is like trying to herd cats or people. :) In most businesses, there is a small group of leaders who make the decisions and hand out directives and incentives to those who will help them meet defined goals. Those leaders can adjust the goals and directives to meet changing market conditions.

I think that decentralized businesses would do well to make use of so-called social technologies for decentralized decision making. One option is holacracy another option is sociocracy. I don't have first hand experience with either, but they both seem to revolve around the following ideas:

  • Hierarchical structures are replaced by "circles", "sub-circles", and "roles" which can be understood by analogy to the human body/organs/cells.
  • Circles and sub-circles are populated with groups of people in an organization who are pursuing a particular shared goal.
  • Communication between circles happens by way of "links" - individuals who are members of multiple groups.
  • Individuals are fully empowered to make decisions within their own role's scope. They get their assigned roles by being voted into it by the relevant circles.

If I recall correctly, sociocracy comes out of 18th century organization techniques that were used by western-European church groups, like the Quakers, and holacracy is a relatively recent extension of sociocracy.

I've never seen it put into practice first-hand, but it sounds like it would be useful. ; -)

Wow, really interesting. I admit I know absolutely nothing about it, but now I am interested in learning more! Great comment.

For not knowing what the post was about, you got a great point across which provides the reason why it will succeed; we like being here and the social aspect ties with our human need to engage. Adding a financial component complicates things due to distribution issues but also provides great potential for interest and growth. I think there is sufficient interest to adapt to a model where things will fall into balance for the ecosystem to grow by creating value to its community.

There is a way to herd cats - put down a bowl of food!

I think if cryptos go up like they did last December Steemit will rapidly look profitable. But if cryptos are held down like they have been it won't!

And we will either do well on both or get a bit dealt to - and that is the nature of gambling...

Congratulations!


This post has been granted a 100% upvote, courtesy to @wokeprincess, from BlissFish!
Enjoy the Bliss!

Join us on Discord!
Upvote this post to help the minnows win a bigger upvote!

"I enjoy the community, I love the ideals, and I have put too much time in to walk away."

That is a lot of what keeps me coming back. Despite my misanthropy, I actually like a lot of the people here and that is more than I can say for most social media outlets.

"I think many are making more here than they could possibly make elsewhere."

That is the truth. It is hard to make money as any kind of content creator.

Thank you for reading my ramble, I guess I had to put some poorly formed thoughts on a blog. lol

Haha poorly fromed thoughts and rambly posts are pretty much the modle I use for my blog so its only fair lol.

Hi @whatsup!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 6.257 which ranks you at #222 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has dropped 1 places in the last three days (old rank 221).

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 257 contributions, your post is ranked at #20.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • You've built up a nice network.
  • The readers appreciate your great work!
  • Good user engagement!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server