All businesses have that same challenge.
If we pay 2 people to clean, we can't pay someone to cook more food. It's still just a cost of doing business.
If I pay for a fence to protect my chickens that is chickens I can't buy...
That's it. It's a cost, if you upgrade the fence, while you will have to do some repairs from time to time, you have handled a big part of the problem. In the future you will be able to produce more eggs.
What if each user considered 5% of their voting power part of paying for a clean house. :)
I'm not arguing as much as trying to offer another way to view it.
How much more would those people you are supporting get if we all weren't supporting the abuse.
The abuse impacts, me and you and those people you are helping as well. :) Just sharing some thoughts
STEEM could be worth more (and the big whales hodling it could be richer) had people flagged certain abusers more in the past, creating a more likeable environment and culture.
Not to mention that flagging certain abusers would have prevented so much STEEM being allocated to them to dump on the markets, creating immense selling pressure.
Flagging is a selfish act, not altruistic. It's protecting your investment.
How is this such a hard concept for people to fucking grasp?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Because it is long-term, cooperative thinking.
It's too late now anyway.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
People don't know what long-term investment is.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit