I know, I know. My readers hate it when I spend energy responding to establishment smears about me; you want my energy and creativity going toward debunking propaganda and pointing to the machinations of the empire. I get it, I really do.
But these smears (and I predicted they were coming in a recent article) are designed to damage my reputation so as to minimize the impact of my work, and I have learned that ignoring them for too long gives the empire loyalists a degree of control over the public narrative about me that they have not earned. Then before you know it blue-checkmarked Twitter accounts are sharing them around as factual information and the number one image for "Caitlin Johnstone" on Google is a picture of me with no makeup in the middle of a gleeful squeal from a video I made for Patreon.
Attractive, right?
I've lost count of the number of smear pieces the Daily Banter (by whom I am blocked on Twitter) has published that are in whole or partially about me. I responded to the first two when they published the blatantly false claim that I have no journalism degree and scared the shit out of me by falsely reporting that I write for Russian propaganda outlets, but I've been ignoring them up til now and it's time to respond to these despicable lying scumbags once again.
The Daily Banter has never denied publishing falsehoods about me; indeed they ended up publishing two unprofessional, juvenile corrections to each of them when pressured. What they have been freaking out about ever since that time is the fact that I threatened to sue them for libel for publishing libelous material about me, because that's somehow unreasonable and unheard of in their privileged little imperialist circle jerk.
Here's the Daily Banter's big tough suburban gangsta Ben Cohen (who also has me blocked on Twitter) putting me in my place when I demanded a real retraction for the Kremlin propagandist smear:
I had indeed firmly intended to sue the Daily Banter and talked to a couple of American lawyers about it, one of whom I guess contacted them. I was told I had a good case because I could prove intent of malice, which is the big issue in such cases. Then I did some more research and found that this outlet doesn't appear to get much circulation, functioning more like a blog whose essays can be used as a weapon on social media to beat up anyone who doesn't fall in line with Clintonite orthodoxy, so I didn't pursue legal action any further. That's the whole entire story from my end.
For Martin Shkreli wannabe Ben Cohen, however, it was just getting started. He authored a bizarre, rambling tale about how I'd ended up "crowdsourcing a fake lawyer from a fake law firm" to accomplish some sort of sinister goal he doesn't make clear. Cohen cites no evidence of this beyond the lawyer who contacted him not having much of an online presence.
I don't claim to know anything about either of the lawyers I ended up speaking to; I never pursued legal action and never paid anyone. Cohen's whole story ultimately boils down to "someone contacted me claiming to be a lawyer and it was weird". But he and his young, dumb and over-funded goon sidekick Jeremy Fassler have been publishing article after article after article squawking about it like it's a thing, including their latest smear piece.
Other than that it's a pretty standard Caitlin Johnstone smear. Fassler claims I'm trying ally with white nationalists (false), talks about "questioning the Russia narrative" as though it's an inherently bad thing (false), and falsely asserts that I am mentally ill (because gaslighting is the only weapon they have left) while sneaking in a few jabs at Glenn Greenwald and Truthdig because of course he does.
And that's pretty much all I have to say about the Daily Banter. Empire loyalists publish smears about me because they can't get me fired since I'm crowdfunded and can't get me de-platformed since my only platform is social media and blogging sites, but I'll always be able to crank out quality material much faster than all of them combined can write smear pieces about me so it's a losing battle for them. I just mainly wanted to address the lawsuit thing since they're using it to try and make me look sleazy and unattractive.
It infuriates many factions all across the political spectrum that I keep gaining momentum despite these smears and will inevitably surpass them all, but they'll never find any real dirt on me since I'm not dirty and they'll never silence me since my voice is uplifted by the crowd. My work is popular because people like it, my lovely haters. I bet you can find a way to live with that.
Thanks for reading! My daily articles are entirely reader-funded, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following me on Twitter, bookmarking my website, checking out my podcast, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, or buying my new book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.
Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Z
You're a very nice lady because I would have said fuck that and taken them to the cleaners. I know these kinds of people shouldn't be "provoked" but their noise should cost them.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Keep on fighting the good fight - enjoy your work
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Sound like you are a "counter puncher" - just like President Trump. :-)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Im skeptical of people who lead with "believe me."
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Good job Caitlin. Way to attract that fire and smack it down.
They are miles wide and millimeters deep; the whole friggin' Establishment.
They're losing control and they know it. Scary time to be a human.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This is the side of Caity's work that I never see. I don't think I've ever read a word from Daily Banter nor ever even visited their site. The only reason I know these articles exist is because of the above post. It's the same as MSM TV outlets. The only time I ever see anything that they air is if Jimmy Dore or Kyle Kulinski do a segment about them. I get that these outlets carry a certain amount of weight because the sheep get herded there but I simply cannot bring myself to view their trash, even if it is to see what propaganda is being pumped out. There's only so much my poor brain can handle. Thank you, Caity, for doing what I cannot.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Isn't it funny how identity politik is applied arbitrarily out of pure self interest, by the same people who have weaponised it against the ordinary citizen. If I wrote a hit piece on Madonna, I would be on an FBI watch list.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Caitlin Johnstone tweeted @ 23 Jun 2017 - 19:25 UTC
Disclaimer: I am just a bot trying to be helpful.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If you're not walking on the line, various external forces that recognize this will not only attempt to lasso you back in, but they will do so by solidifying your presence and make sure that it never happens again. One way to do this is by character assassination; a form of ad hominem discreditation strategy. It's not about any dark sinister forces, it's about the main political doctrine dominating debate and the unhinged corporate-driven profits being a natural process of this. You're lucky you're not part of European debate. What I noticed was the consistent labelling of the term ''Trojan Horse'' attributed to those with divergent opinions about mainstream opinions about Russia. Don't want to unleash a deadly new round of sanctions against the regional power of Europe being already threatened by Atlanticist presence there? All right, we're going to make sure you get the stamp of being Putin's personal ''Trojan horse''. Such is life in Europe. In any case, you have a lot of followers that do know better; you're not a tag/label of anything, which is a danger for them, as being pro common sense moves way out of line in their system of propaganda.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Girl, I don't blame you for fighting back. Your words are your strength because they carry truth. That's the power of being a great writer. They are stalkers - they're just jelly!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit