You tell things which you don't even try to understand. For this reason what you tell sounds as shit. All what you try to achieve, it to draw attention of a whale with the flattery. Your posts gather $10 only thanks to a boat of Wang which doesn't even read what you write.
Claw people say that distribution of voices is unfair, they tell the truth. If a whale of upvote your post, you receive about $300 for him. You know how many it will be necessary voteof users with balance of the account as yours in order that you have received the same sum?
About 10546 vote. But whether there will be sometime such number of users with such balance? 30000 users of STEEMIT have also no $10. And if all of them at the same time upvote you earn your post, about 0.01 dollars.
Whales won't be able even to award in a year such number of accounts with such sums. And other people, won't begin to enter so many means into the project of 100-200 dollars it already much. You don't even try to understand what a problem, and you already open the mouth.
All of you still consider system fair?
Well, before blaming me for submitting bad quality posts and claiming that the system is unfair as hell read the post once again. The system IS unfair and there is a stratification in Steemit community. And there's nothing wrong with it. Judging from your English you seem to be from some Slavic country, maybe Russia. Judging from your posting feed you've submitted two or three posts that didn't recieve what you wanted from them. Is that the reason for making fuss now about my earning on wang only? Who are then those 219 people who've liked what I posted?
Steemit is not a fair system as capitalism is. And that is good.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit