So here's the part where the fake, cheery SEO styled "agree with everything" mentality that dominates this sty of a website goes away and I offer some rational, scathing criticism.
You've been warned. :D
I think the phrase we need to focus on is not "For God so loved the world..." more so than "God sent". Notice the word "sent" is the past tense variant, something that happened and not something that will happen or is happening. This is very important, especially when we're discussing a deity who canonically is supposed to be all knowing and all powerful.
Let's have a brief look at what those two character traits mean before we go any further. All knowing, or omniscient, does not mean "knows all that there is". It's so much more than that. The term means "knows all that is possible, and all that is NOT possible, to know". Omniscience isn't all of THE information, it is INFINITE POSSIBLE information. Likewise, omnipotence does not mean "can lift any heavy boulder" or "can make anything you see around you". It means INFINITE POTENTIAL FOR POWER. For the omniscient being, no knowledge is beyond knowing and no outcome is unknown. For the omnipotent being, all action is easier than breathing, INFINITE displays of power require 0 energy input. The creation of the universe for such a being was neither confusing, nor difficult.
So, now that we've established some parameters here, a problem should be evident to you. Why is an omnipotent, omniscient being in a reactionary position? Why was a fix to a problem sent? Why does a being who knew specifically, with unlimited clarity, what would happen have to REACT to a problem? Why does a being with unlimited potential to fix any errors in his reasoning BEFORE he acts send an imperfect solution to a problem he obviously knew would occur?
God may have loved the world, but he didn't love it enough to employ his defining character traits in their fullest measure to ensure he didn't HAVE to incarnate within it and perform an incredibly painful and horrible task to poorly fix a problem he knew would occur from the outset. It's the same mentality I hear on the news after every severe storm outbreak in the American midwest: " Oh we just lost everything and we'll literally never be able to live as good a life as we did, mathematically speaking, and everyone who lived in our general vicinity is either dead or just as permanently ruined as we are, but THANK GOD."
Thank god? Thank the being who knew the tornado would come but didn't love you enough to avert it BEFORE it happened to spare you soul crushing hardship for the rest of your life? Thank god for using unbelievable suffering cast upon extremely limited and unseeing beings such as ourselves to prove menial philosophical points? (Lest you be tempted to suggest god did this to teach us something. I teach my children not to harm others but I don't do it by tying them up and bull whipping them until they vomit and pass out)
No, this "God so loved the world" nonsense doesn't pan out logically. God may love the world, but not very much. Certainly not enough to do what any intelligent and capable human being would do in averting trouble BEFORE it happens. And when that capability and intelligence is literally infinite in scope, as opposed to our little meaningless dust-triumphs on the tiny speck floating around an insignificant sun, failing to act cannot be attributed to love.
At best it is a sign of disinterest. At worst, an indication of outright malevolence. Either god is all-knowing/all-powerful, OR he is loving. Simple empirical observation demonstrates easily that he is not both.
I understand your argument. My willingness to love my savior is my willingness. I am not being forced to love him. I do it out of free will. There can be no free will if we have no choice.
So if we lived in a world that was with out harm to us we would accept our roles but we would not love the maker. We would go along with our everyday task and all would be wonderful.
God desires our love for him. It can't be a forced love. It has to be a free willing love that accepts his gift to us. God never forces himself on us but instead allows us to see his greatness and desire him the way he desires us.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"There can be no free will if there is no choice"
You're ignoring what I said and forcing the conversation into absurd parameters. I agree free will is not a possibility in a universe that precludes the potential for choice. But it does not logically follow that free will can only exist in a universe where ALL possible choices are available, nor in one which includes terrible outcomes. One does not need to be at pain of incredible hardship to have a choice. If you disagree, then you disagree with every parent who has ever lived and carefully curated their childrens' environment to include choices that are appropriate for their level of intellectual development and those which allow for failure for the good of child, but not catastrophic failure that leads to severe harm.
I agree, God does not force himself on us. In fact, it's very damning that Christian apologetics for the fact that incredible suffering exists in a universe where there is supposedly a loving, all powerful and all knowing steward, are academically similar to the scenario in which there is no god, or that there is a god but he doesn't particularly give a shit about what's going on.
This is not love. This is neglectful parenting. I do not need to teach my child about the dangers of the world by letting the little fool jam a fork into the light socket. No all knowing, all powerful being who loves us needs to subject us to tornadoes, nor genetically inherited sin conditions which, if left untreated, cause eternal damnation to prove philosophical points, nor to give us the opportunity to love him.
And yet here we are. We certainly ARE subjected to severe weather and, if your bible is to be believed, have in fact inherited sin conditions which will assure our consumption in eternal hellfire if we don't follow teachings poorly stewarded from manipulation in a book written mostly by people who didn't know what electricity is and sheep herders. The extraordinarily poor recording of the most important information ever given to mankind, alone, is demonstration enough that god really doesn't think very much of you.
The god of your bible is a sociopath.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I have three kids and I know this much. My kids would hate me if I dictated their every move. They would resent me and rebel. But if I explain all consequences of each choice, then I have given them the knowledge they need to make choices. Can I still push them they way I want yes. But their love for me will be pure if I allow it to grow from them and not me pushing it on them.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yet again, you are ignoring the points made. I understand a child needs freedom. But I know for a fact that you do not give them freedom beyond their ability to handle. If that were not so, they would be child protective services' children, and not yours. You will not allow your children to do heroin because "If I limit them their love for me wont be pure." That is an emotional appeal to nonsense.
Are you going to acknowledge and discuss the points made or does your argument depend on you closing your eyes? Can your claim not stand up to the smallest scrutiny? I am no genius. If it cannot stand up to me it has no hope of standing up to my betters.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I acknowledge your points and they are valid. But do acknowledged there is an evil force warring with the God of the universe. The evil of this world being lead be a demonic force and that force is causing the pain and misery of this world. I opened up in my blog by saying this world is harsh and it hates all of us. The world hates us because of the demonic forces ruling it. God gave us a way out of the misery. But to end the misery would mean to end the whole world. God does not want that. He desires that all come to him for their salvation and that non should perish. The world is out to destroy the inhabitants, not God.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"Acknowledge there is an evil force warring with god"
Demonstrate it exists. Consideration is not due without proof, and incredible claims require commensurate evidence.
And even if you do it does not back up your initial point. In fact it would back MINE up. No evil force can war with an all powerful, all knowing being BUT with that being's permission. And we have already established that one does not need to subject a child to incredible danger in order to give them the ability to make choices and love us as parents.
If such an evil force exists, it is god's fault for not precluding its existence in the first place. Yet again, your god is in a reactionary position. And that's awful suspicious.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
So now for a question. Is your hope only in this life time. We live our 70 or so years and that is it. Explain to me why get up if that is all we have.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I asked a question first. If you desire answers to your questions it would be polite to provide answers to mine. Thus I reiterate: Demonstrate your proposed evil force exists and that it is warring with a god who permitted that evil force to exist in the first place when he did not have to.
I don't know if there are other lifetimes or not. No one has ever presented falsifiable evidence to me that such lives exist beyond impotent personal testimony from ancient books written by people who didn't even know basic maths. Perhaps they passed for intelligent in their time, but in this time that's called illiteracy and I have no ethical imperative to accept the rambling of illiterates who have not made the effort to demonstrate a basic level of personal intellectual competence.
Your question suggests an appeal to extremes. There is no requirement for gods or afterlifes to have hope in an uncaring universe. That is called nihilism and it's what petulant rebellious teenagers do to piss off mom and dad.
To answer your question bluntly, I am what I do. Nothing more. Nothing less. I am not my intentions. I am not my beliefs. Un-acted upon, intentions are valueless no matter how "nice" they may be. Chance plays a bigger role in everything than most people are comfortable with, even to the point many refuse to acknowledge it's even a thing because the philosophical and practical implications are discouraging. Never the less, the hope in my day, at least the amount of it I can realistically bank upon without having to rely on sickly lotteries, is entirely a product of the behaviors of myself and other people. "All we are" can be an awful lot if you are putting the right amount of effort in the right places.
There was once a man who was tired of being a patent clerk and decided to figure out what light was. In the process of trying to understand this phenomenon he discovered something about the nature of the universe and figured out how to express that discovery mathematically to such an exacting degree of accuracy that it made predictions that turned out to be true. In fact, were it not for this man's discovery that time is relative to motion, the orbiting satellites which have made it possible for you and me to have this debate would not exist! It would not be possible to get the timing of the signals bounced off of it if you did not understand that time is different for the satellite than it is for you and me solely because it is moving at such a remarkable speed.
Thank god? No. Thank Einstein. He was a genius in the truest sense of the word, a real life mutant who's cognitive tools were well better than probably any of ours could ever hope to be. But none of that would have mattered had Einstein not been unsatisfied with his lot in the office and had he not made an attempt at something. He isn't great because of what he was born with. The story of the genius who never tried is as common as sand. He is great because of what he did.
And like him, I will only be what I do. Therefore I'd damn well better do well. There is profound purpose in what I chose to set my hands and mind to, even though I'll almost certainly never impact the world the way Einstein did. I will impact my children MORE than he. I will impact those who love me more than he.
There is incredible potential in every day entirely divorced from the existence, or non existence, of any deity or after life. Those things impact the urgency of life only, not the nature of it. If you have no hope without the existence of a god and without the existence of inherent, built-in purpose, then that was your choice, and your choice alone.
The good news about that is today is a new day and you are free to make better choices if you wish.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Just add. If I forced myself on my wife would that be true love or would she be put in a position to do my will because I said so. Same applies with God. My wife would own me if I hurt her in anyway. But because she loves me she allows me to have a relationship with her. Which to be frank makes no sense to me because I am jerk most of the time. But love looks past the flaws. God looks past our flaws. He accepts us as we are and all he desires is our love.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit