RE: All aboard, the @flagtrail

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

All aboard, the @flagtrail

in cleansteem •  6 years ago 

I am so sad that you are starting to go that way as well. All that valuable voting power could be used to support people who actually produce good content on the blockchain.
I am so against this flagging business and find it very ego driven and hurtful to the community. Hundreds of good content creators leave because they are not seeing their posts rewarded.
I very much believe that we grow the things we put energy toward. The flagging community is growing the problem of lousy content by diverting their valuable possible upvotes for good content. I truly hope that you reconsider that move.
And no matter how "experienced" the people are that decide who gets a downvote - it is still censorship.
Anyway, as I am writing this I feel myself getting more and more annoyed and I don't want to start my day that way.
But honestly, initiatives like that have made me consider more than once to give up on Steem.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
Loading...

@mariannewest

It might surprise you. but we want to see good content creators get more rewards too.
Something you might be overlooking, is: when an abuser DOESN'T get a reward for their useless content, the rewards of other content creators increases. That's how the reward pool works. It distributes a more or less fixed amount of STEEM, between those with a positive pending payout on their posts. So the less STEEM abusers get, the more high quality content creators such as yourself earn.
For instance the whale-no-voting experiment started by @abit two years ago, increased the voting power of every minnow by a significant sum. In other words, less posts with pending payouts, a higher payout for the remaining posts.

Regarding whether this is censorship or not: even when a post reaches 0.00$ payout, it's not hidden from the various Steem UI (steemit, steempeak, etc'). Everyone can still access it, and be exposed to the content of the post(no matter how useless it is). The word you're looking for is demonetization, which means, making certain types of content\activity unprofitable; i.e posting random images from the internet to upvote them for 2$, each.
People can post whatever they want to Steem. But it doesn't mean they should necessarily earn from it

@mariannewest, we are revising the SFR system so that credits are issued and can instead be used by content creators on quality contributions to this chain. (Instead of generic follow on flag comments.)

I think flagging is often a thankless job but someone has gotta do it. We are trying to give something back to help keep your platform clean.

@steemflagrewards fysa

Hi @mariannewest, thank you for the comment.

I'm on my phone at the moment and so cannot give you the response your comment deserves, I will reply with more when I get home.

  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment

I see you are asking for upvotes, this is listed as spam/abuse in the FAQs.

There are many contests that run the same way, and so it's unfortunate you have been 'targeted'.

  ·  6 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment

Predict the winner by voting my comment or posting a comment to share 100% of liquid rewards...

Totally don't need upvotes there. /s

issa option lmao

  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment

Do you know how to read subscripts?

Sign up for Bitconnect, or not. It's an option, but I would really like you to do it. lol

  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment

I don't understand your point.

That's too bad.