RE: The IPCC Exposed

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

The IPCC Exposed

in climate •  6 years ago 

I just think, whether he's 100% right on the facts or not, 2 things remain:

1- People should do their own research and question everything regardless if it's Corbett or any other source.

2- Technology is being implemented only as a system of control and that system is being used (in the shadows) by the Elite/Deep State/Statists (whatever you want to call them) to produce scarcity/poverty/violence/terrorism/add buzzword here

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
  1. whats the point of regularly watching a journalist if you have to go fact check everything they say? surely that is against why you would be listening to them in the first place. sure, there are some things you need to check but if your argument is the journalist can talk a load of shit and then your job is to just look it up then you dont understand what journalism is, thats their whole fucking job. if i wanted that i could read any mainstream media.
  2. you obviously know nothing at all about technology, you sound like one of these conspiracy fuckwits who thinks literally everything is a plot. i used to be into conspiracy stuff myself, not to your extent, but then i grew up. 9/11 being the kicker for me. realising that all the conspiracy nuts talking points and photos they use are completely biased was a revelation for me i used to believe some of that shit. go and read ALL of metabunk - make sure you look it all up to check it and also grow a brain cos youll need that - then come back :)

n01 -

For someone using rhetoric such as "you obviously know nothing at all" it's not surprising that you apparently were never told this bit of common sense:

"Believe nothing you hear and only half of what you see."

But then it's irrational to seek the conversion of others and I'm no altruist so I'm entirely content to respect your right to subject yourself to leaps of faith. However it's my charitable nature to say to you that it's reasonable to expect that no self respecting anarchist will lift a finger to impede the cannibalism of socialist versus socialist. By all means stay with your chosen collective egos I don't care. I'm going the other way thanks. By the way, where did all the buffalo go?

Woodchuck Pirate
aka Raymond J Raupers Jr USA
woodchuckpirate.com

hi mr chuckup private

youre obviously a moron, one of those either so dumb they cant grasp how written words go together to form conceptual thought or one wilfully trying to twist what i said for your own benefit. being as you seem to believe this page is your blog i guess you feel the need to reply to every single post. in this case i suggest you fuckoff because you simply dont have to brain to engage with me. i also detest american conspiracy losers such as yourself.

when i used the phrase you know nothing at all to that shithead, i meant in reference to myself, not actually zero. he probably knows how to ask his mum to wipe his nose granted. other than that tho, he is just another member of a huge group of morons of which you are also a member. please fucking die all of you and do us a favour.

LOL, Richard Nikoley much?

Have a nice evening!

Woodchuck Pirate
aka Raymond J Raupers Jr USA
woodchuckpirate.com

sad yank conspiracy twat much ?

please fucking die ;)

You are way too aggressive, a little rude, a little coarse and I don't really feel like replying to you except to say (in the rude like manner you present yourself): Blindly believing in people makes you a sheep. Thinking the fact someone is a "journalist" means that person is full-proof makes you a sheep. Not cross-checking EVERYTHING makes you a sheep. Finally, reading Metabunk??? Good luck.

blindly believing in people does indeed make you a sheep. i said grow a brain before you come back and you obviously havent complied. yes, try reading metabunk. you might have to go fact check some of it. lol.

actually one more thought - you twats that say you have to fact check everything - ill be willing to bet my penis that you wouldnt fact check metabunk because that is how your cognitive bias works. if you were able to do that you wouldnt believe some of the ridiculous pillars of the 9/11 bollocks. my guess is the bias works by dismissing certain sources of facts as unsound. in your case it probably will be by selecting batshit mental sources of information over sensible ones. have a nice day cuntface.