What is the reading of the confrontation at the NPC press conference?

In 2019, the two national conferences have entered the second day.

At 11:15 this morning, the second press conference of the 13th National People's Congress held its first press conference. This is the second appearance of the conference spokesman Zhang Yesui. As a "diplomatic veteran", Zhang Yezhen is no stranger to the sensitive and sharp topics thrown by journalists.

The international situation has been raging over the past year. Sino-US economic and trade frictions remain to be solved. Some European and American countries are still facing the wall of China's 5G technology. The "Golden Special" meeting ended a few days ago, and the DPRK-US agreement has not yet been reached... In the face of the reporter's "drilling" question, our news How do the spokespersons see the move?

1. US CNN: How do you view the current Sino-US relations and China-US economic and trade consultations? (Uncle Island said: The tricky part of this topic lies in Sino-US economic and trade frictions, because the negotiations between the two sides have made important progress, but they have not yet ended. What to do next? The outside world is highly concerned)

Zhang Yesui: The facts have fully proved that Sino-US cooperation is both good and bad, and cooperation is the best choice for both sides. (Uncle Shi said: First, a big principle is also a basic understanding and position of the Chinese side, emphasizing that this is proved by facts. It’s not Chinese wishful thinking).

Interests of both countries have deep intertwined, I think the Sino-US relations is not a conflict against the interests of any party, in addition, to deal with new issues in the context of globalization with the old thinking of the cold war is certainly no way out (Island Uncle said: Implied machine front, criticize some people still have the old thinking of the Cold War, since it is old thinking, it is not keeping up with the times. Who? You know).

Regarding the economic and trade issues between China and the United States, everyone is very concerned. For some time, the economic and trade teams of the two sides have carried out fruitful and intensive consultations, and have made important progress on many issues of common concern to both sides. The two countries and the international community have All have made a positive response. I believe that the essence of Sino-US economic and trade relations is mutually beneficial and win-win. Therefore, we hope that the two sides will continue to hold consultations and reach a mutually beneficial and win-win agreement. (Uncle Shi said: It is in the interest of both sides to specifically discuss the consultations, and it is also in line with the expectations of the international community. It can be fully proved that mutual benefit and win-win is the foundation, and there is no way out for the Cold War. The agreement has not yet been signed, so I have left a hope).

1. Korean Broadcasting and Television Station: What role does China play in the issue of denuclearization of the peninsula? (Uncle Shi said: Koreans care about the peace process on the peninsula. Under the a few days ago, the second "Golden Specialist" broke up and scared South Korea. In addition, the role of China in the peninsula peace process has not been Ignore. After the "Golden Specialist", there are also voices saying that the direct contact between the DPRK and the United States may not work, so the Korean reporter wants to inquire about China's attitude)

Zhang Yesao: The Korean Peninsula issue is very complicated and sensitive. It is not an easy task to solve it. It cannot be expected to be resolved through one or two meetings. (Uncle Shi said: the meaning is very clear, much talk, one or two times).

We believe that the key is to adhere to the correct way of political settlement, adhere to the correct direction of denuclearization of the peninsula and establish a peaceful mechanism on the peninsula. (Uncle Shi said: Affirming the political settlement of negotiations is the right way, and it is always better than the armed confrontation of arrogance. This is the general direction of China's hopes).

North Korea and the United States are key parties to the peninsula issue . We hope that the DPRK and the United States will stand firm in their convictions, remain patient, talk in the right direction, and talk about new developments. It is in the interest of all parties to maintain peace and stability on the peninsula. China is committed to the denuclearization of the peninsula and the establishment of a peace mechanism on the peninsula, and has played an active and constructive role in this regard. China will continue to make active efforts in its own way (Uncle Shi said: "A key party", the Chinese side has a clear attitude and hopes that the DPRK and the US will continue to talk. As for the role of China, Zhang Yesui said, "With your own Ways to make positive efforts", what way? You can review the various news about the peninsula between.

1. China Daily: How to respond to the concerns of the United States and other countries on Huawei? ( Uncle Island said: It was just a while ago when the United States pulled a group of allies and small partners to boycott China’s Huawei)

Zhang Yesao: China has always encouraged and advocated enterprises to strictly abide by local laws and regulations in overseas operations. It has never and will not require Chinese companies to engage in activities that violate local laws and regulations. (Uncle Shi said: This sentence is very heavy, aimed at Some unfounded accusations from foreign public opinion say that China secretly supports Huawei to steal intelligence. This is nonsense.)

Some officials of the US government use the National Intelligence Law to say that there are so-called security risks in the products of certain Chinese enterprises . They intervene in economic behaviors by political means, violate the rules of the WTO, and interfere with the fair market competition. This is a typical double standard. Unfair, not ethical (Uncle Shi said: Happy! Needless to say).

The Chinese government has repeatedly expressed its solemn stance. We hope that the countries concerned will abide by the market principles of fair competition and provide a fair and non-discriminatory business environment for Chinese enterprises to invest and operate ( Uncle Shi said: this is China's attitude).

1. Bloomberg, USA: How does China respond to concerns about “lack of transparency” and “increased defense spending”? (Uncle Island said: The old tune is heavy, every year is speculating on Chinese military spending, tired?)

Zhang Yesui: Maintaining a reasonable and moderate increase in defense spending is a need to safeguard national security and adapt to military changes with Chinese characteristics. Looking at it vertically, since 2016, China’s defense spending has dropped from a double-digit growth rate of five consecutive years to a single digit. I think these ratios are very clear to you (Ishio said: it means you know it). Horizontal comparison, then, in 2018 China's defense expenditure to GDP ratio of about 1.3%, while the defense expenditure of some major developed countries of the gross domestic product (GDP) in more than 2% (Island Shu said: Take concrete If you speak the numbers, you will be asked if you are not satisfied.)

I think whether a country poses a military threat to other countries depends on the country’s foreign and defense policies, not on how much the country’s defense spending has increased. China has always adhered to the path of peaceful development and implemented a defensive national defense policy. China’s limited defense spending is solely for the purpose of safeguarding the sovereignty, security and territorial integrity of the country and will not pose a threat to other countries. Thank you (Uncle Island said: China’s defense funding has increased, it is a standard for a big country. We use it to defend the country and not threaten others. These words have been said many times, but some media always have to pick this topic, behind It is still "China threat theory" at work.

1. Singapore’s Lianhe Zaobao: “One Belt, One Road” will cause some countries to fall into a “debt trap”? (Uncle Island said: This is also the point where many Western public opinion attacks China’s “One Belt, One Road” initiative, saying that China has caused many developing countries to fall into the “debt trap” and kidnapped them, etc.)

Zhang Yesui: The “One Belt, One Road” initiative conforms to the trend of cooperation and win-win situation (Uncle Shi said: First of all, the judgment of the big show, this is in line with the trend of the times). The principle of “One Belt, One Road” is to discuss, build, and share, while also adhering to the model of market-oriented operation. Its goal is to achieve high-quality development. I want to emphasize that whether it is project selection or investment and financing cooperation, it is the decision made by the participants. (Uncle Shi said: Deliberately emphasize that the “Belt and Road” is the part of the participants, and there is no compulsion. “One Belt and One Road "is an open cooperation model."

China attaches great importance to the sustainability of debt, and will not impose on project cooperation, nor will it create any traps (Uncle Shi said: this sentence is very determined). Of course, like other international cooperation initiatives, there will be some difficulties, problems, risks and challenges in the implementation of the “Belt and Road” initiative. However, with the implementation of the initiative and continuous improvement and improvement, I believe that the construction of the “Belt and Road” will achieve better development and bring more sense of gain to the people of the participating countries (Uncle Shi said: step back, any new things) The development is not always smooth, there will be difficulties and risks, but as long as the general direction is right, it is in line with the times, then we must persist and develop and improve in the continuous advancement).

With such an interpretation, do island friends think that the press conference of the NPC is very worth seeing?