Ive read through your comment a few times, nothing there really bothers me that much,
Im not over the moon about being verbally attacked on my first post and what really should be the "warm welcome" stage, ..
and i really didnt feel the need to drag it out, ...
but there is just 1 comment up there that i really think is wrong ..
"your personal desire for profit isn't more important then other peoples security and privacy."
That is 100% correct in every way possible, .. but at no point did i say that,
That is putting words in my mouth, in fact your statement doesn't hold any validity unless "other people's security and privacy" are at risk, .. which is simply not true and CAN be indefinitely proved.
I dont want to argue with you dude, but if there were anything "wrong" with CoinCollector or any of my software dont you think someone out of 25000+ customers in nearly 2 years would have noticed by now ?
I can see you have been here a while and respected by the members, hell if bitcoinparadise says your a good chap then its got to be true, ..
I just felt a bit singled out if you know what i mean.
anyway, it kinda looks like you have already made your mind up about me, so i guess it is what it is.
Thanks
CJ
I don't want to argue and drag this out, I've already said what I thought and pointed out some pretty clear facts (not accusations).
Anyone that's been paying attention for the last decade knows that ad networks are a major infection vector. You can't "indefinately prove" anything, you refuse to even positively identify WHAT code you claim is safe (by not providing a unique file hash).
I'm really surprised nobody else had pointed any of this out to you before tbh, this makes me doubt the validity of your "25k+ customers" claim if this is how you react .
Years of scams and malware specifically targeted to noob crypto users makes me extremely suspicious of this type of software, and I still think my comments were valid.
You're asking people to disregard basic security practices / opsec for a max reward of A FEW CENTS versus a max risk of EVERYTHING they have on their machine (ie: wallet, identity, this varies by person).
I'm sorry you're so offended by me pointing out facts, but at no point did you "verbally" (or textually) attack you, I simply wrote a list of problems I see with your approach to software distribution in the nicest way I could think of.
I'm just blunt - that doesn't make it an attack and I really (still) don't have any issue with you at all.
Not going to keep responding about this, I think anyone that reads my comments with a clear head can see what I'm saying and why..
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit