picking up were we left off

The Natural design of a person - premise of common law

Common law recognizes that Creator creates man and sets forth "natural laws" of governance. Recognition that highest authority is conferred by Creator.

How laws work today, does not recognize such. Merely, the ink and paper reflection of what was once understood in the practice of common law and the rights therein. See that the constitution; bill of rights; declaration merely point to the plethora of rights. Meaning the rights of a sovereign person where more numerous than the paper.

So, today we will now see that protecting your "corporate name," is important. As what name really accurately reflects the being? In my life, I have went by nerd, bookworm, woof, meow, chirp...etc all the names of everything and everyone I responded to. But the name of the "corporate person," is not a name, rather its a property solely owned and controlled by my flesh and cognition. This is sole reason why liability of signatures is crucially significant.

A sovereign issue

This is interesting because we are born sovereign. Then our parents are deceived by the seemingly good nature of certifying your birth. The only deception and its the biggest by far, is that one retains this status after certification. As it induces us into the "commerce clause" section 5 of Amendment 14. Then our spirit given flesh is mirrored with a "corporate name."

Thus, IHASHBLOX and ihashblox exist at the same period of time and unless ihashblox declares IHASHBLOX© is his personal property it will be used in endless ways by others. Since now that IHASHBLOX© exists, the government can legally and lawfully interact with them. As both government and "corporate names" are both artificial beings (creation of man).


Every person born as a citizen of United States of America, is born sovereign. We have read judges reaffirm this, but there is still an unspoken issue. Why is it denied by courts or federal reserve members, that idea of sovereignty is long passed? Because it is, until you stake claim to it.


In the last article we talked about different parties. We came to conclusion, that signing as authorized rep; or agent is sufficient to absolve liability as having a surety status. Or being defined in an instrument as a surety.


surety:

The party responsible for: a debt, default or other failing of a second party and the liabilities begin simultaneously. In a contract of suretyship*, a surety becomes a party to the obligation. - Blacks Law 7th ed

Suretyship:

The contract of suretyship maybe entered into by all persons who is sui juris* and capable of entering into other contracts. -Boveirs Law Dictionary 6th Ed.

Sui Juris:

of his own right; possessing his/her own civil and social right; not under any legal disability; or power of another, or guardianship.

Its now apparent that sovereign and sui juris are relational, sui juris is more watered down definition of sovereign. It should be evident by now that only sui juris is capable of becoming a surety by deception and fraud.

Todays conclusion is; where everyone not born sovereign -sui juris it would not ever be possible to have the "corporate name." I'll repeat myself and say again. We where born sovereign and sui juris, as our own masters under the Creator. Where it not so, there would be no way of inducement into commerce clauses or owning a corporate name.

This information is strictly educational. Sadly, I have to state this. I cant be responsible for your actions or inaction.

Later