RE: Announcing the Delegation Committee

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Announcing the Delegation Committee

in committee •  6 years ago 

I am slightly concerned about potential conflicts of interest considering he is part owner of Steem Monsters which has also submitted an application.

Personally, I don't think any user whose is also an applicant should be on the committee so there will not be even so much as a hint of impropriety in the process.

Posted using Partiko Android

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I agree that no one acting as a representative for this program should be allowed to have ownership in projects receiving benefits from the program. That is just a logical rule.

That is like allowing Olympic Athletes to judge the very competitions they are competing in. Similar case in point.. DTube allows Clixmoney to hold the voting keys.. and he of course is a "DTube creator", as well as a "DTube curator", and we all know how that works out so well for (Clix & Friends).

This is so crooked it stinks to high hell. But why should we expect anything different. Isn't scheming and scamming what this blockchain does best to all of the innocent sheep.

It's all who ya know, and who ya blow. A mirror of real life politics. A dog and pony show. Gross.

You guys are a lost cause.

Have a good one!

Cheers!

  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment

Hi @ackza! Special squad of highly trained hamsters prepared this delegation link for you:
steemconnect 2.0 SP delegation to @elipowell.

Loading...
  ·  6 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment

LOL

Thanks for all the votes. You inspire me to keep doing what I do.

Your persistence might be admirable if it was actually effective. Got nothing worthwhile to do?

self-voted to counteract downvotes that might reduce visibility.

Agree!

Nothing ingenious about selecting representatives to line their own pockets first. Anybody without a high school diploma can do it.

Not saying they should not be paid, as long as they keep their hands off the delegations they are directed to allocate.

100% agree on conflict of interest here.

  ·  6 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment

I am not sure what words you are trying to express.

  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago (edited)

I think it is okay for anyone to be on the committee, and you don't generally want people who are uninvolved and uninformed, but they should step aside on any specific cases when their own application (or a directly competing application) is being considered.

For that reason and others it is probably best to have a slightly larger committee.

  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment

If I'm not mistaken, back in the day we started flagging @stimialiti for bid bot abuse and / or spam.

So you are suddenly cool with bid bot abuse now? Funny how you change sides so quickly.

Posted using Partiko Android

  ·  6 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment

I don't think you understood the joke.

@enforcer48 shared something on our discord and I made a correlation jokingly hence the intentional strikethru on the top level comment.

@bafi respond hinting that we may have found a pattern and was telling enforcer that we need to take note.

You are making a mountain out of a mole hill. Chill out

Edit: I take that is what got you going about me "circlejerking". Instead of me seeing value in the words, you seem to want to malign me. 👌

  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment