RE: Announcing the Delegation Committee

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Announcing the Delegation Committee

in committee •  6 years ago 

I agree that no one acting as a representative for this program should be allowed to have ownership in projects receiving benefits from the program. That is just a logical rule.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

That is like allowing Olympic Athletes to judge the very competitions they are competing in. Similar case in point.. DTube allows Clixmoney to hold the voting keys.. and he of course is a "DTube creator", as well as a "DTube curator", and we all know how that works out so well for (Clix & Friends).

This is so crooked it stinks to high hell. But why should we expect anything different. Isn't scheming and scamming what this blockchain does best to all of the innocent sheep.

It's all who ya know, and who ya blow. A mirror of real life politics. A dog and pony show. Gross.

You guys are a lost cause.

Have a good one!

Cheers!

  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment

Hi @ackza! Special squad of highly trained hamsters prepared this delegation link for you:
steemconnect 2.0 SP delegation to @elipowell.

Loading...
  ·  6 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment
  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment

LOL

Thanks for all the votes. You inspire me to keep doing what I do.

Your persistence might be admirable if it was actually effective. Got nothing worthwhile to do?

self-voted to counteract downvotes that might reduce visibility.