Open Mindedness &amp; Critical Thinking vs. Global Conditioning &quot;Education&quot;

pastbastard (53) · 7 years ago

All thinking is critical and open-minded. Science is no more open-minded than religion. If you cannot marry the two, or think the two are at odds, you might need a new paradigm. Having followed you for a few days, I am betting you have figured this out. The Big Bang theory is a great example, while the expanding universe is proven it does not imply the Big Bang. Again, if we look at Genesis (Greek for Berashith) we see where the Big Bang theory might have been born out of the Judeo-Christian concept as they are very similar.

$0.00

canudo76 (43) · 7 years ago

The Big Bang Theory Is Just Another Creation Myth. Observing An Expansion For A Couple Of Decades Or Centuries Also Doesn't Mean There Is No Contraction Coming. If I Observe My Lungs For Two Seconds Only While Inhaling Doesn't Mean They Expand Forever. Everything They Say About The Universe Is Based On Nothing & Are Only Ridiculous Assumptions.
Obviously There Is No Endless Expansion In Nature. Every Modern Theory About The Universe Is Misrepresented Nonsense. That's My Opinion.

$0.00

pastbastard (53) · 7 years ago

That is exactly why we cannot get a "theory of it all." I will not even go into Darwin, but the preface of his most famous work states: This theory, like all science, is provisional. I really think the universe has been expanding for billions of years, but what was before that could not have been explained by a "Big Bang." It simply does not pass the sniff test. Speaking against that, or evolution, is not acceptable in scholarly spheres; more importantly it is not funded.

$0.00

pastbastard (53) · 7 years ago

BTW, I totally do not buy "flat earth" but it is interesting as most of the arguments can disprove round earth. Almost nobody knows, but from very high up there appears to be a slight curve and if the plane goes up and down a few times you can witness the sunset several times in an hour. Still not buying the round earth theory until we have FTL travel.

$0.00

canudo76 (43) · 7 years ago (edited)

The Thing I Buy About Flat Earth Or Geocentrism Is The Very Close Sun And Stars. And If I Believe The Universe Is Much More Compact & The Earth Has A Special Or Central Position There Is No Way Around Flat Earth.

$0.00

pastbastard (53) · 7 years ago

I want to believe it is flat because there are people I would really like to push over the edge!

$0.00

canudo76 (43) · 7 years ago (edited)

This Is The Multidimensional Thing Nobody Gets Into The Head On The Flat Earth Realm. There Is No Edge. It Is A Four Dimensional Structure And You Can't Fall Off Of It. It Is Like Running Out Of A Room And Entering It On The Other Side At The Same Time.

$0.00

pastbastard (53) · 7 years ago

Didn't think about that. The expanding universe theory requires a 4D model. Also maybe the earth does not revolve. It could be travelling a straight line but the space-time is bent by the Sun's massive gravity.....

$0.00

canudo76 (43) · 7 years ago

The Concept Of Gravity Is What You Need Only When You Want To Have An Over Scaled Material Version Of The Universe. I Think This Can Also Be Solved With An Aether Model In A Non Material Universe.
That Is Maybe The Hardest Unsolved Problem Because They Have Canceled Out The Stuff That Holds Universe Together.

$0.00

canudo76 (43) · 7 years ago (edited)

The Main Problems In Education Are The First Three Dimensions. Dimension Zero, One & Two. These Are Pure Informational Dimensions. Every Point Or Line That You Can See Has Nothing To Do With That. This Is Where Misrepresentation Starts. If You Can Perceive It Than It Has To Have At Least Three Dimensions. Representational Geometrical Mathematics Is Already The First Failure.

$0.00

pastbastard (53) · 7 years ago

I have often thought that if an object has so many dimensions, we actually perceive one less. Hence, the simplest 3D object is a four-sided pyramid. It actually needs to be 4D to perceive it. 4D objects are there also, but we need to have D5 to actually "see" them....beyond that, I can not describe the theory but have spoken with a few more evolved minds who agree. Eigenstates and String theory seem to agree as far as I can understand. Advanced computational mathematics can also bend time about, and I believe that is where the singularity will occur.

$0.00

canudo76 (43) · 7 years ago

I believe singularity has occurred many times already. This is what makes singularity and the future of mankind 100% predictable. I still believe the greatest philosophers just found out about the cyclic nature of development.
The biggest question in philosophy. What will we do when we made ourselves obsolete? Something like Wall-E or something like Terminator or both again or until the system really fails...?

$0.02

pastbastard (53) · 7 years ago

Rewriting conclusion form thesis

$0.00

pastbastard (53) · 7 years ago

That knowledge is buried deeply in the Fellow Craft degree of Freemasonry. This is exactly why when a Brother is asked what the letter "G" stands for, they usually answer "Geometry." Other mystery schools also knew this in antiquity but it seems lost in more modern thought. Also we do not really have any superficies, they are a mathematical construct. A piece of paper, no matter how thin, is still 3D.

$0.00