Howdy partners and it looks like the wild west is still alive and well in the UK. It is all about who has the biggest gun, as per usual, and the big green military machine is still churning out thousands of child migrants, otherwise known as 'potential adoptees'.

Basically, life in the big city really does suck balls. We are forced to send our children to schools who only care about government funding, while the parents are made to work 50 hrs per week, each, in order to pay the bills. For the majority of the public this leaves about one pound and twenty seven pence left to spend at the weekend... Woo flipping hoo, lets go buy a lottery ticket...

I have to admit that this is a cunning plan by the elite. I've not even got enough cash left to make a Molotov cocktail, nor the aim to get into the queens bog, so fighting our way out of this would be futile. But hey, I have a stiff upper-lip and a moral compass left in my soul and while there is breath in my lungs I will be denouncing the deceptions.

I have been passed a link to a recent "report" from the BBC;

"I was told I shouldn't touch him(her newborn child) as this would be unfair to the adoptive mother"....

"He was then placed at the foot of my bed, where he was making little baby noises, ticking noises... I, in-fact, did pick him up, very guiltily, and I christened him, with some water that I had in the room, with his name"

This is a link to the BBC version of events, which is very sparse indeed....

source - BBC online

So for those who wasted the time to watch that ridiculously short video, which was accompanied by the offensively vague write-up, here is a more accurate report of what happened, plus a lot more. And the adoption agency the BBC, again, forgot to mention is called St Patrick's Guild.

It has also come to my attention that the BBC have have only given the name of married name of Tressa and not the name she held at the time of this undisclosed adoption.

Tressa's maiden name is actually Donnelly.

"On visiting St Patrick’s Guild, she was told by a nun that no file existed on her or her son and that she “must have imagined” she had given birth to a son. It would be a further 20 years before the agency finally admitted it had her file."

source- Irishexaminer

I am hoping that most of you have taken the time to watch the video above. I am also hoping that you have noticed that the lack of documentation was a huge factor in Tressa's horrifying case. I am now very confident in saying that we have a definite remedy for this problem and it is something I have been highlighting for a while now.

This is not about supporting common-law and nothing to do with constitutions.

THIS IS A PLACE TO DECLARE THE BIRTH OF YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN, AS LIVING BREATHING HUMAN BEINGS AND NOT AS A CORPORATION WHO STANDS UNDER STATUTE LAW.
(As is the case with the Governments version of the birth certificate you have now)

This will cost you absolutely nothing and, if nothing else, it will be another document of evidence that the social services have to deny. As was the case with Tressa Reeves, her child's details were completely removed from the system and neither the mother or son had any documentation to help reunite them. If the place holding these documents is not corrupt and is also set up to specifically combat this kind of treacherous behaviour, then hopefully you will see the use of having a public register that actually protects its clients details.

I pray that nobody else has to resort to proving the existence of their own flesh and blood in this way. But in today's world, I know that this would be foolishly optimistic .

Whether you like the subject of law or not, when you are faced with the 'Child welfare system' this is what they will use against you. Or at least, this is the framework of what they will use against you. A crooked social worker, is exactly the same as a crooked cop. Just a piece of trash in a uniform who carries a badge of assumed authority. With all the judges also joining in this sick fancy dress party, we begin to find ourselves in a bit of a circus....A solid looking dome, hiding the total madness inside.

These crooks are not allowed to make the rules up as they go along and they are not allowed to kidnap children with due-diligence to the protocols of their own system. A social worker who has been granted a CPO(child protection order), without showing evidence to prove the need for such drastic action, has and is part of a conspiracy to kidnap. Obviously, this is against the law and should be punished, but who are you gonna appeal to, the judges golfing-buddy??

I'm not saying "don't battle the social workers in the courts". I am just saying that if you do have to, then it would be advantageous to know who and what you were dealing with and also how to deal with them.

So now I will leave you in the hands of an expert in this field, John Smith.

Please go to 52mins 13seconds and if it is something you think could help, which it would, then please follow the links below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3409&v=w-LGUBtP_OU

So even if you don't fancy forming your own courts, or finding out more, you can always just register you and your children's names to the common law registry and if anything ever did happen in the future you will be able to present the court with an official document of birth. A document that will prove to any judge, your names and that you are in-fact the parent of the child-victim(s).

Thanks for reading.

PTYAY

Written by Rebel-Dan