Not that it matters, but good chance that Susan Rice is a M2F Transgendered Person

Here is the Original Photograph of young Susan Rice, from a The Root article about her deceased father, not-so-strangely enough a Federal Reserve Governor. Yeah.

-- why? Because as I was archiving it, I was being 'actively fought' by archive.org AND archive.is not to save this page. I had to employ some dirty tricks. Why? My theory is someone didn't want me to archive this page

As I saved the first snapshot, strangely the young susan rice image was absent from that snapshot. Just whitespace remains...

---

---

...so I had to take it again, this time, doublearchiving it.

---

---

I shouldn't have to resort to such treachery but there you go. We're up against some wild and widely deployed AI control grid algorithms, folks

Ok, so in the absence of seeing Susan Rice's penis, I can tell you that the argument could be made that young Susan Rice looking extremely male, wearing male identifying clothes is simply not enough. That would be very true.

However, I'm not your ordinary duck. I actually spend an unusual amount of time looking at M2F transgendered persons. Ok I'll just fess up (like you don't already know this) I look at 'shemale porn'. A LOT. I'm interested in it for reasons well beyond masturbation but actually for an unusual branch of research into a theory that I'm not quite ready to discuss at this moment. And generally speaking am very sympathetic, even more than most liberal people, towards the difficulty and courage a 'truly' gender-dysphoric person (not a transtrender) must face in their transition. I watch Blair White on youtube and think she's amazing.

Ok so what's this extra evidence?

Well there is tell-tale feature of M2F that is far more reliable than the adams apple, which, according to others, some females defy. Most specifically Ann Coulter, who has a decidedly male throat to go with her 'swan like neck'. And this feature is called "brow bossing" and it does not occur whatsoever with biological, natural-born female persons. This is a feature that develops prominently during puberty, and its a bony protrusion of the center of the forhead like a 'shelf' from brow to brow and across the top of the nose ridge.

You can clearly see in the old photo that Susan Rice has both a much wider nose than she does now, and that there is evidence of brow bossing. This means she's had rhinoplasy; which means she's had plastic surgery; and you can also see on her forhead the evidence of a VERY unnatural uppercase LAMBDA Λ shape...

---

...under the skin of her forehead. That mid-brow trephination of the triangular area amongst the bossed brow suggests a telltale sign of surgery to remove or diminish the signs of browbossing, and since it was done a long time ago, it left the obvious lambda Λ shape; the technique has improved greatly over the years.

Also it's worth noting that like many paleocryptotransgenders (older transgenders still in the closet), Rice is a big advocate of LGBTQIA++ thirdwave feminism concerns, most notably transgender rights. That just makes sense to me. But what doesn't make sense is why she wouldn't at this point come out of the closet along with her cohorts? Isn't that a tad hypocritical?

Maybe it's because if this 'Rice is a M2F theory' is true (and yes its a theory--in the absence of penis like I said), should she comes out, she may fear she would somehow lose credibility for having lied to the public all this time.

It's about optics and politics, after all. And then suddenly people around her would be called into question, as the lying liars who lie all the time that they are. (Credit to Jason Goodman for that phrase.)

We may start to look around and wonder if the following constellated folks are transgender:

• Susan Power for one.
• And Susan Power
• And also SUSAN POWER
• Susan Collins (cryptocrat)
• Loretta Lynch (who has obvious browbossing she never tried to conceal)
• Michelle Obama (brow bossing)
• Many many female democrats

Before this starts to sound like a witch hunt, I want to point something out.

If America is so progressive now, then why don't they disclose that Obama is a CIA agent, that Michelle is a transgendered person, that their two kids are war orphans from Somalia or whatever; that Susan Power is transgender, that Susan Rice is transgender, that many others are transgender and they're all part of a secret society of transgenders who have insinuated themselves into all forms of government. Let's just call this the LAMBDA society, ok? Why wouldn't they have their moment of great acceptance?

Oh right, it's because they are politicians and therefore they are liars, and they are psychopaths and want to squeeze the last little drop out of divisive identity politics that they can

But most of all, there's a final danger of coming out........are you ready for it??? Ok here goes:

It's that when they come out......

....No.Body.Cares.

Because again, America is more tolerant and progressive THAN THEY WANT US TO BE

And none of this really matters except to point out that these bastard politicians are living a lie, and they're embroiling us in their vast illusions. I suggest that it's the only thing they produce, and that DC is a factory that produces illusion daily, and for some of us, we live and breathe in this illusion and if we lose it, we're left with nothing at all.