Yea! 3 Bundy Defendants Offered Release on Bail!

in conspiracy •  7 years ago  (edited)

A good sign! A win in court and monetary remedy, relief, and recourse should be next for each Defendant.

Cliven Bundy declined to accept Federal Judge Navarro's offer of bail, with conditions. He stands firmly in solidarity with the other Defendants, who were not approved for bail.

As for Ryan Payne, a Federal Judge in Oregon must also approve his bail conditions, before he is released on bail.

NOTES:

  1. BLM could have implemented strategies to accomplish their goal without escalating the situation.
  2. After the grazing rights were sold to Clark County, the BLM should have ceased all legal action against Cliven Bundy,
    family, and supporters, unless requested by Clark County and thereby acting on behalf of Clark County to do so. A
    Motion for Discovery should force Clark County to submit said documents, even though Clark County did/does not
    have the ownership rights to sue Cliven Bundy or any of the other Defendants.
  3. People have the right to call for aid, if they feel threatened.
  4. County Sheriffs cannot do the job they are elected to do, because they take an oath to obey the Federal
    government, instead of the people who elect them.
  5. Therefore, each Bundy Defendant should submit a Motion for Discovery of all the Sheriff's documents and
    recordings; as well as Clark County documents and recordings. Such discovery should show the full extent of their
    complicity and betrayal; instead of their assistance.
  6. The Court Order to seize the Bundy cattle was based upon false and misleading statements regarding land
    ownership and land rights; especially after Clark County purchased the grazing rights that the BLM had no right to
    sell.
  7. What percent of cattle grazing fees did/does BLM or Clark County pay to Native American tribes?
  8. Where are the land management/lease/sale agreements between Native Americans and U. S. Department of
    Interior/BLM and/or Clark County for these disputed lands, whereby they can prove ownership rights?
  9. While the stand-off on 04/12/2014 was a tense and dangerous situation, it was less so than the potential
    alternative. The Bundy Defendants/militia supporters acted as "Buffers" who successfully DE-ESCALATED the
    increasingly volatile situation of the moment.
  10. Had the Bundy Defendants/militia supporters not intervened, many in the Bundy family may have been
    slaughtered, without any independent or unbiased witnesses or reporting of the circumstances.
  11. Each Defendant is not required to appear in Court, as the Federal Court can dismiss the juries, withdraw plea
    agreements, and decide "Not Guilty"for each Bundy Defendant; at sealed hearings based solely upon all the
    complaints and motions already filed, for the lack of disclosure/discovery on the part of the BLM and Clark County
    (the silent and hidden Complainant).
  12. Remedy, Relief, and Recourse: BLM and Clark County equally shall be made by the Federal Court to pay each
    Defendant for lost wages, loss of real and personal property, pain and suffering, and slander; and Cliven Bundy shall
    be restored to his grazing privileges; and there shall be no appeal by BLM or Clark County.
  13. If the BLM or Clark County cannot locate each Defendant in order to pay said monetary relief, the payments
    shall be deposited into each State Treasury of the last known address of each respective Defendant, and claimed by
    them at their own disposal.

by Iamai December 1, 2017 4:59 pm

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

They should have never been charged.

Absolutely right.