The question is:
Is Abdul a conspiracy theory nut?
https://steemit.com/uncategorized/@shockleftmedia/re-uncategorized-20171027t194458665z
or
Is James Corbett a GateKeeper?
https://steemit.com/history/@corbettreport/no-albert-pike-did-not-predict-wwiii
Abdul says yes to both. Abdul knows that a conspiracy only needs two people in order to qualify as a conspiracy. The word theory does not apply to the conspiracy or the conspirators.
The word theory is a word that is directed towards the person seeking answers to what happened in a criminal act that has taken place without any justice to resolve the crime.
The phrase "Conspiracy Theory" has been used to silence those who question any official narrative sanctioned by the government and the mainstream media.
In my article on steemit, I do not claim to know if the words allegedly spoken by Pike to Mazzini was a documented fact. In Corbett's argument, his title states emphatically that Pike did not predict world war III. So if we compare and contrast, my article remains objective while Corbett's article acts like the authority on the subject.
My article on steemit places the words attributed to Pike without commentary or embellishment.
Corbett's article orders me to stop him if I've heard the next paragraph before. He then goes on to narrate the Pike conspiracy with the exact date that Pike allegedly wrote the letter. He called Pike "eminent" , conveying honor and respect upon Pike.
At the very beginning, he describes the act of writing to fellow Mason and friend, Giuseppe Mazzini, as a friendly loving candlelight affair.
Then he begins to quote the words that we all agree have been attributed throughout history to Pike by all of us. Corbett, in his authoritative style, says Pike should be asking Mazzini about his family to start his letter. He then implies Pike is using magic and that he is only predicting the future instead of making long-term plans that would ensure that such a vision would come to fruition.
Next, Corbett tells us about the second world war and the state of Israel etc. Then Corbett once again praises Pike's so-called ability to predict the future by making the authoritative statement that the third world war has yet to occur. He describes the alleged words as everybody else has .
Corbett finishes by narrating his made up version of the communication between Pike and Mazzini by referring to the proper way to mail letters 1871 and what a normal person in 1871 would do afterwards on the way back home from the post office.
Next on the Corbett agenda, he lays his sight on the true target of his article: conspiracy theorist like me who want to know the truth and put in tremendous time resources to connect the dots and obtain a clearer picture of historical events that have conflicting narratives. Once again Corbett assumes authority by telling his readers what sounds familiar while simultaneously designating the reader as maybe "swimming in conspiracy circles". Now, Corbett is the great predictor who knows exactly the amount of conspiracies and different versions of the conspiracy that all of the theorizers have ever thought about.
He finishes this authoritative decree by citing the daily Star and praising the Star in the same manner that he praises Pike in his relationship with Mazzini as an esteemed honorable Mason's having an intercontinental chat.
The article by the Star is written on July 20th, 2019. James Corbett's article is written on April 13th 2019. Then, we find out that the article written in the Star was originally written on March 7th, 2016. My article was written on October 17th, 2017.
Moving right along, out of the gate, the Daily Star , so esteemed by Corbett, misinforms the reader by claiming the letter is more than "200 years old". This would mean, according to the Stars time line, that Pike wrote this letter in 1819 when he was 10 years old. 2019 - 200 is 1819. This article was written and rewritten by Rory McKeown and corroborated by suspected gatekeeper James Corbett.
McKeown further misinforms by claiming that Pike was a captain in the US army during the Civil war without specifying the fact that he was a confederate soldier. So now it's me versus Corbett and McKeown.
Later in the article, McKeown changes the date that the letter was written to 1871. Do the math and that would be 2024 - 1871 = only 153 years ago or 149 years with Corbett or 146 years when McKeown originally authored the report for the Star. He doesn't identify Mazzini as a fellow Mason.
After stating Pikes' alleged words to Mazzini in his own words and embellishments, McKeown repeats the same words that me and James have documented in our articles. While I make no claim to the veracity of Pike's letter, Corbett and McKeon show their bias, prejudice, and manipulation by equating plans with predictions. Pike's word that we all have in our articles, are orders of what must be done and who is to do them.
Corbett and McKeown give Pike plausible deniability regarding his role as The Mastermind of a long-term plot that has yet to reach fruition. Since the year 1871, many have written about Pike's alleged letter to Mazzini. This author never claimed that he had the smoking gun. That smoking gun has obviously been removed from circulation.
My question in my article was: Does this reflect today's situation that we find ourselves in in 2017? As a conspiracy theorizer, I laid out a theory which discussed the murder of Moammar Gaddafi and the reaction of then Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton. I introduced my relationship to that situation. I gave references supporting my theory. Next, I tied Hillary to James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence chief who admitted to spying ,"unwittedly", on the American public- you and I .
I am a Muslim born American suffering from the evil policies of the American government. Our entire government is beholden to a foreign power, the American Israeli political action committee(AIPAC) Palestine is a Muslim State. I can say, without question, that the so-called plan of Mazzini and Pike is the situation we find ourselves in 2024 as well as 2019 2017 and 2016.
I used to like James Corbett until he basically defamed me and neutralized me with his article nearly 2 years after mine. God tells us to love our enemies and now I see why.
The mistakes that they make become evidence to the tactics they use in their hostile actions. The degrading of those that seek the truth is immoral. Calling us derogatory names is childish.
Corbett continues his degradation of conspiracy theorists and obfuscation of the Pike/Mazzini plan by talking about some sexual headlines. He continues to set his readers up with conflicting statements.
He says we're living in the shadow of the war of terror in the clash of civilizations. Different words to describe Pike's plans. Then he continues to act as the authority on the subject by saying there's nothing to be learned from this conspiracy between Pike and Mazzini.
He states that "admitted hoaxters and "unscrupulous researchers" are interested in getting clicks and not the truth. When looking at the researchers that the superior Corbett disparages, only one of them could have wanted more clicks. That must be Michael Haupt He must be the unscrupulous researcher described by a Corbett. None of the other researchers cited by Corbett had websites. Gotcha! Corbett then shows of map/flowchart to illustrate what he says about how the dots connect. His map never connected Mazzini and Pike together as leaders of the Mason. In fact ,no connection at all.
After all this proven obfuscation, Corvette points us to an article that he claimed we must read in order to really understand the truth. An article by Terry Melanson. It was authored in 2010. When you follow the link provided by Corbett, it goes to Google books which is difficult to navigate and the words were written in a foreign language.
After years of fighting conspiracy theorist debunkers, I'm familiar with some of their tactics.
- They make long drawn-out statements filled with assortment of have truth insults and falsehoods.
- They use sources that are of the same caliber.
- They only wish to close the readers mind and the possibility that a group of individuals with like-minded ambitions could have the goal of world domination in mass murder.
- They use ridicule and satire as weapons for intimidation and censorship.
There is no need to discuss Corbett's conspiracy theory about conspiracy theorists any further. It's all there in plain old English. He will not be able to hide it. It proves the immutability of the blockchain and how men and women can turn the surveillance State Censor Ship inside out to expose the liars and identify the gatekeepers.
Corbett was correct in his title that "No, Albert Pike did NOT predict world war III". However, Corbett obfuscated the obvious truth: Pike, Mazzini, the Freemasons and their secrets societies planned world war III as they did world war II and world war I. This make Corbett, at the very least, a gatekeeper and I'll leave it at that.
Repent from your wicked ways, Mr Corbett. Ask God's forgiveness. Atone for the harm you've done to me and my fellow conspiracy theorizers.
If you want to support this author, My Cash App handle is:
$kkkrybaby413
Peace
@KRLUV9
SHOCKLEFTMEDIA 🤔