perhaps it doesn't combust before the combustion chamber due to the vacuum, if you heat wood in a vacuum it doesn't combust and at high temperature would also apparently break up into its separate elements. I actually stated in the post that in the eyes of classical physics the process appears impossible, but I will choose to remain open minded with the knowledge that anything that goes contrary to accepted facts within academia is ignored and essentially swept under the rug in favor of dogmatic theories. None of us actually know anything, we think we experience a material world of matter yet the closer we look the more we realise existence takes place in a singular unified field, one immaterial source energy.. It's bizarre.
RE: Is The Oil Industry Suppressing Alternative Fuels? We can run an engine on tap water!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Is The Oil Industry Suppressing Alternative Fuels? We can run an engine on tap water!
the gasifier heats up wood or other material so that it releases its hydrocarbons in an anoxic environment. The laws of physics at least in regards to the GEET engine and "free energy" are fairly straight forward, you can't run a lawnmower or a generator off of water. You can run an engine briefly or poorly on watered down gas. The reason no one is running their car or powering their house with a GEET engine anywhere in the world is that it cannot be done, not as a result of any sort of conspiracy.
Did you read about the plasma waste disposal and how it does not create much if any net energy?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The post was aimed at highlighting that there is a long list of people exploring alternative "free" energy sources who have seemingly met government interest and interference. The deeper we dig the longer the list becomes. Tesla seemed fairly adamant on harnessing ambient electromagnetic energies, and indeed the very substance of the universe and matter is one unified electronic field, classical physics becomes obsolete when we delve into what the world and existence itself is actually made of. Slightly off topic but I'm completely down with the theory that the sun is electrical as opposed to a big ball of fire, I think it's a shame that our minds have been closed by science dogma.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The sun is not a big ball of fire, it's a large nuclear reaction it has electric and magnetic forces involved. The guy who invented the GEET engine died of old age didn't he?
It's very a very appealing prospect, getting free energy. That's how you know that if any of these things actually worked the government or whoever would not be able to suppress them. If you could make a water engine like the guy in the video said, your own homemade Mr. Fusion at garage tolerances, then everyone would be doing that. Everybody in Alaska would have converted their generators long ago.
The laws of physics preclude free energy and perpetual motion machines.
Wood gasifiers are real so you can find all sorts of people using them for all sorts of things.
Tesla was using the earth to transmit electricity, not generate it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
When I say a big ball of fire in the sky I mean I prefer the theory that the sun is electrical and not a nuclear furnace, you quite simply cannot state what the sun is with such certainty, we don't know.
If it was possible to build a multi-million dollar business from scratch then everyone would be doing it, wouldn't they?
The laws of classical physics only apply to how the world appears on the surface, and we are still making discoveries that seemingly contradict previous theories.
Yes wood is a good fuel and a non-pollutant.
Tesla wanted to extract energy from the ionosphere and provide free and wireless energy, his funding was pulled.
Coldfusion appears to open us to the possibility of "free" energy.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah we do, we know in detail the various nuclear reactions that occur in the sun.
No, most people are far too lazy and/or stupid and lack the self confidence to do it. It's quite possible if that is your goal and you are willing and able to work for it. The richest guys I know started with nothing.
Yes, sometimes theories of physics are contradicted, the laws of physics, like conservation of energy, are never contradicted.
Burning wood puts a lot of particulates into the air but it is carbon neutral.
No, Tesla wanted to transmit electricity wirelessly and he was able to do so, he harnessed the power of Niagara falls, hydroelectric was the source. The problem with wireless transmission is that you could not meter it, you are basically broadcasting electricity, anyone could receive it. Obviously that is not a sound business plan and that's why his funding was pulled. Fun fact about Tesla, since he owned the patent on AC he was receiving a royalty of $1 for each kilowatt hour of AC power. He choose to give up his royalty because otherwise AC electricity would have been too expensive for mass adoption.
Cold fusion is a technology that is always 10 years away.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Tesla was aiming at free and wireless electricity. It's absolutely shocking (little pun there) that Tesla was pretty much completely left out of the history and science we have been fed by the education system.
... His first discussion is about a machine that can gather heat from the ambient air. He calls it a “Self-acting Engine” since it could run indefinitely from the solar energy stored in the air. He called it “the ideal way of obtaining motive power”......
No we do not know exactly how the sun works in much the same way we have no idea what gravity is, the electric sun theory actually seems to make a lot of sense, any theory that goes against mainstream dogma is criticised and often called pseudoscience which is hilariously hypocritical.
I think a lot of Tesla's ideas about free energy sourced from the atmosphere were based on the electric universe theory and in fact Einstein died trying to prove that not only were the forces of electricity and magnetism of the same field of energy, where they were previously regarded as separate forces, but that gravity was also in the same field, in proving gravity to be in the same field of energy as electromagnetism he would have proved a unified field for all existence (I'm not sure why it would prove that)....
I generally do weigh up both sides of things and often sit on the fence as far as opinions go, in this case however I am much more open to the possibilities in the unknown and the mystery of the subatomic quantum world rather than having my mind closed by old fashioned ideas. It's not as black and white as science once made out.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
He is talking about a sterling engine, they are used in some commercial scale solar electric generation stations. they work on temperature differentials. You can buy a model that you can build at home. my brother had to build one as part of his mechanical engineering degree from MIT. Goddard built a working solar power unit prior to 1920.
we know a lot about the sun.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun
tesla's electricity would have been free of charge, not "free energy" in the perpetual motion machine sense.
I won the science fair twice, once was with my tesla coil and the other was with my pickle light based on quantum physics.
The geet engine and perpetual motion free energy machines are impossible under both classic and quantum physics.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Perhaps you're right. So Tesla did not believe in the electromagnetic nature of the universe and did not believe that we could harness this unlimited energy source to power the world for free. It would definitely be unreasonable to assume that the huge spinning magnet we live on could provide free and usable electricity. The electric sun model has no scientific bases because we already know exactly what it is, we know everything and scientists should stop investigating any method of trying to harness the natural power that governs the universe because they will forever be at a loss. It is not and never will be possible to tap the electric forces that are the very makeup of the material world. Perpetual motion is never going to be possible ever because we know everything already.
I'm glad we cleared this up.
This is fairly interesting
"However the atoms in time crystals – the existence of which was first suggested in 2012 – repeat a pattern across the fourth dimension, time.
This essentially means they should oscillate forever without any external influence."
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Sun
The Sun is the star at the center of the Solar System. It is a nearly perfect sphere of hot plasma, with internal convective motion that generates a magnetic field via a dynamo process. It is by far the most important source of energy for life on Earth. Its diameter is about 1.39 million kilometers, i.e.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit