An interesting experiment. Were any of the posts you thought (and did) generate steem spam? Or just poorly written?
RE: Making more STEEM by curating content vs. writing is possible, but it comes with a price
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Making more STEEM by curating content vs. writing is possible, but it comes with a price
In fact, I do not even know what I was upvoting. Good catchy titles, smap for the masses... cute girls... and I was upvoting.
I had this strategy of running down the "ACTIVE" list, and see posts with already $5 to $20 in the list, and then I would hope that they will continue to climb.
Typical example is: curation reward of 0.512 STEEM POWER for allasyummyfood/7dek2o-hello-steemit-my-name-is-alla-i-am-a-youtuber-and-private-chef-with-my-own-show-let-s-do-this
One great post I upvoted is that one (a great story):
curation reward of 0.012 STEEM POWER for jrd/arrows-of-the-leviathan-prologue-and-chapter-1
Fun fact: the author had been considered as stealing content by a bot...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit