Fact Checkers and their dishonest ways

There are a lot of nasty tricks that various publications will use in order to make their stories appear true when in fact they simply use a few tricky words to muddle the waters in order to continue feeding their readers what they want to hear. Recently, "fact checkers" have emerged to counter any argument that someone has that is contray tto what they think. Most of the time these tricks are used in politics or more recently in relation to Covid.

For example: There is a popular statement in social media going on right now where Dr. Muller, who is credited with inventing the PCR test is meant to have said.

Here is the quotes that the fact-checkers are going after

(Dr) Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test publicly called Dr. Anthony Fauci a fraud

and also

“[Dr Mullis] said that this PCR test was not made to detect Covid. It’s designed to pick up a signature of DNA and RNA of the person being tested.”

The "fact checkers" all over the media immediately jumped on both of these things to give them a "false" rating. I don't want to argue with anyone about what is going on with PCR tests because I don't understand them and neither do most people. However, what the media did with these fact checks was dishonest but then again, I don't think the media being dishonest should surprise anyone these days.

They don't go into any detail to quote the things that Dr. Mullis actually did say but they will point out that there is no record of him ever having said either one of these things.

What they don't tell you is that Covid-19 didn't exist when Mullis died in August of 2019, or if it did, it wasn't the big deal that it is now. He was probably worried about other things like not dying at the time anyway. The media has jumped through hoops to hide the fact that Mullis is not alone in his criticism of Fauci and mostly they do this by not talking about it and depending on sites like YouTube to make those videos very difficult to find.

Ok fact checkers... you are technically correct, he didn't say exactly either one of those things but if you had a shred of reliability and honesty in your organizations you would point out that Dr Muller, the Nobel Prize-winning creator of the PCR test,actually was a massive critic of Dr. Fauci and from the interviews that he conducted about him it seems as though the guy really has zero respect for Fauci.

If you want to see Dr. Muller's exact interview where he basically rips Fauci to shreds long before anyone knew who Fauci was you can find it HERE You actually CAN find this on YouTube but wow did they do a great job burying i and making it extremely difficult to find, that's what YouTube does.

In that interview the "fact checkers" are correct in saying that Dr. Muller never called Dr. Fauci a "fraud." He didn't use that exact word. What they don't point out is that Dr. Muller said much worse of Fauci than just call him a fraud.

• "He (Fauci) does not understand electron microscopy, he does not understand medicine, and he should not be in the position that he is in....these are just administrative people and they do not know anything that is going on in the body"
• "Those guys have an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have. They make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to"
• "Tony Fauci does not have a problem going on television in front of the people that pay his salary and lying directly into the camera."

Watch the above-linked video if you think I am making it up, you will see that I am not.

I don't know if you know much about language but while he didn't ever use the word "fraud," he's saying that Fauci is a fraud and if the "fact checkers" were being honest, they would acknowledge that.

As for their other "fact check" they are technically correct. Dr. Muller didn't ever state that the PCR test should not be used to detect Covid-19..... why? Because it didn't exist when he was alive. I do find it a bit on the eerie side that he just happened to suddenly die just before Covid-19 became the global catastrophe that it is now.

He didn't have a chance to weight in on Covid-19 testing, but he did have this to say about the test that is widely used today for determining if you can get on an airplane, go to school, or even be in the Olympics.

With the PCR test, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in almost anybody... if you can magnify one single molecule up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, there's very few molecules that your body doesn't have one single one of and in that way the test can be misused by claiming that the results are meaningful.

I don't pay much attention to the "fact checkers" these days because they aren't really checking facts, they are using lawyer-like tactics to get someone off on a technicality. They have an agenda that doesn't include getting the truth to the masses. Their agenda is something I cannot understand, but it certainly isn't journalism.