I purposefully never talk about juiced vs. un-juiced people. I think us being divided along this particular line is very, very dangerous.
Look into history to see what happens next, once society on a large scale accepts that one group are the pariahs – and more importantly: convinces itself that this group are RIGHTFULLY being classified as pariahs.
Convincing people of this, is what propaganda is there for. And it's in full effect, as far as I am concerned.
In Germany, it's done a bit more subtle, to maintain the German's favorite excuse for remaining apathetic, which is that 'we still have it so good here'.
The government spokesperson will nicely and calmly state that the possibility to get juiced is now available for everyone, always implying that there was no reason not to get the juice, and always implying that it's the refusal to get the juice that's prolonging the nightmare.
In the States, you have talk show hosts like Jimmy Kimmel say this: "Dr. Fauci said that if hospitals get any more overcrowded, they're going to have to make some very tough choices, about who gets an ICU bed. That choice doesn't seem so tough for me: vaccinated person having a heart attack, 'yes, come right on in, we'll take care of ya'. Unvaccinated guy who gobbled horse goo, 'Rest in peace, wheezy'."
How would you feel if he applied the same line of reasoning to smokers vs. no-smokers?
Or obese vs. non-obese?
Should I now be able to slap the McDonald's out your hands, when I see you eating it?
No, of course not.
Why? Because it's your bloody choice, and none of my bloody business.
If you're in accord with Kimmel's line of reasoning, how do you reconcile that with dismissing the crazy conspiracy theorists, who've been telling you since March 2020 that the rona would be used to introduce mandatory juicing?
Link to the EU vaccine roadmap, published BEFORE the rona: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/vaccination/docs/2019-2022_roadmap_en.pdf
How do you reconcile believing evil megalomaniacs, who said all we had to do was wear a mask for two weeks to flatten the curve, when no evil megalomaniac in history ever let go of control once established?
Mask for two weeks turned into a year-and-a-half; even when the curve was flat, restrictions were maintained under the false promise of safety, which is the quickest way to get virtue-signallers on board; numbers have been misrepresented; we're basing analysis on a test, which its inventor himself didn't deem suitable for the purpose it is now being used for; then the juice got introduced, not one but two, now, boosters, and after all of this, you can still get "it".
Yet, the un-juiced are the issue? How so?
Does this constant moving of goalposts chime with your understanding of science?
How can you argue that science should be open to change, that openness to change is in fact the core trait of science, but not investigate the scientists telling you that a virus doesn't make you ill, nor can it spread.
While I am genuinely happy to hear about anybody not experiencing any side-effects from the juice, I notice that there's ill-will bubbling up against the un-juiced.
I've seen a meme go round, which I'd like to address in a few points, not to bash anyone, but to genuinely ask a few questions.
The meme starts like this:
"I'm vaccinated and no, I don't know what's in it. I don't know what's in this vaccine, the ones I had as a child or in other treatments, whether it's for cancer, HIV, the one for polyarthritis, or vaccines for infants or children."
Does that mean, you don't want to know what's being injected into you? Or simply that you don't care?
In both cases, how can you then dismiss others as anti-juice, for taking a good look into what's in it, and then deciding not to take it, IRRESPECTIVE OF WHAT YOU CHOOSE TO DO, which is totally your choice.
I received vaccines as a child but didn't take any more the moment I was old enough to take charge of my medical autonomy.
I know my parents meant well, just like a lot of people do now. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
The difference between my parents and many people: if I tell my parents I don't think the vaccines as a child would have been necessary, they won't throw a tantrum because it triggers their view of the world.
Instead, they'll process what I have to say, and admit that it was more about social pressure, conformity and, most importantly, our trust in the medical establishment, and particularly smooth-talking doctors.
One person close to me in my family has "had it," only I don't say she's "had it," because all she had was a test not suited to detect an illness showing a positive result.
Yes, she was feeling ill, and yes, the symptoms changed compared to a regular flu, just like the 5 Biological Laws of Nature/New Medicine explain.
Again, the only difference between my family member and many members of society is that she didn't throw a tantrum when I pointed this out to her.
Which brings us to the next point in the meme: "I just trust my doctor when he says it’s needed."
Unpopular fact: Doctors kill far more people in the U.S. every year than people using firearms.
Worldwide, doctors are amongst the leading causes of death.
Trusting a doctor that's schooled in a faulty understanding of what constitutes health and illness is useless.
There are scientists who have been trying to contribute to a new understanding, who are systematically defamed. This has been going on for years.
Here's a talk show episode from 1995, where Dr. Rieke Geerd Hamer, the inventor or better yet re-discoverer of the New Medicine, is a guest:
The tactics by the moderators, who clearly have an agenda, are the same as today: emotionalize the audience, defame the Dr., but by no means let him lay out the facts, and don't ever address the facts. Even the allopathic doctors on the show cannot argue the facts, they only emotionalize the audience.
You don't have to like Dr. Hamer, you can even detest his views. It doesn't change his scientific (re-)discoveries.
25 years later, nothing has changed in the way media treats anyone not supporting the agenda. How can you not see this?
On goes the meme: "I also don't know what's in Ibuprofen, Tylenol, or other meds, it just cures my headaches & my pains. I don't know what's in the ink for tattoos, or every ingredient in my soap or shampoo or even deodorants. I don’t know about the long-term effect of cell phone use..."
Well, how about informing yourself about them? Is the love for life so low in humanity that we just don't give a shit anymore?
I stopped taking Ibuprofen, precisely because I know what's in it now. At the same time, I don't tell anybody they cannot take it.
I stopped using deodorants, precisely because I know what's in them now, and because I've learned about the true causes of body odor.
I don't use shampoo anymore; I literally have one bar of odorless curd soap for everything.
Why, because scientists, who found knowledge through constant experimentation, mostly on themselves, have shared their invaluable knowledge.
The result? I haven't taken a pill in at least a decade, I haven't fallen really ill in about the same amount of time.
When my body forms a lot of mucus these days, I can usually deduce why that is, thanks to the 5 Biological Laws of Nature/New Medicine, a science in the truest sense of the word.
And here's the kicker: a science, which you can verify on yourself.
Unfortunately, the meme suggests that, for many of us, verifying things isn't a priority.
Please, stop this "little old me, what do I know," attitude and embrace the fact that you can KNOW. That you can innerstand.
The meme continues: "In short, there are a lot of things I don't know and never will."
Indeed, there are. In fact, the more you learn about life and its magnificence, the more you understand how much you don't know.
That doesn't mean though that there aren't a lot of things you CAN learn and understand. Why would practicing your health – mental, emotional, physical – not be on top of that list???
Why trust snake-oil salesmen when they try and imply you couldn't take care of your health yourself?
And if you don't care, I ask again: how can you simply dismiss all the people that do care and therefore have changed their lives under a massive mental effort, and now simply insist on their bodily autonomy in all, but especially in health, choices?
The meme continues: "I just know one thing: life is short, very short, and I still want to do something other than just going to work every day and staying locked in my home. I still want to travel and hug people without fear and find a little feeling of life 'before'."
First, life will be much longer, once we embrace the true innerstanding of what constitutes health, which has mostly to do with the food we intake:
PHYSICAL FOOD, FOOD FOR TOUGHT, as well as SOULFOOD.
Second, this part of the meme shows that getting juiced is not about health, but just about getting freedoms back.
And this chimes with all the people in my circle, who got juiced to be able to travel again or not lose their jobs.
If we continue on the path we're on, there'll be more and more people jumping on the bandwagon of calling out the un-juiced as the reason this crisis is not coming to an end.
It won't be for medical or scientifically sound reasons, which many falsely believe they cannot innerstand. It'll just be about getting back freedoms, which many falsely believe was up to the state.
This part of the meme exposes that we're all being blackmailed by the bloody state to inject ourselves with a substance to get our life back.
That just shows you that it was never our life to begin with. We are all slaves in this system, and now's the time to wake up and rebel. Either that, or, well, cement humanity's slave status for future generations.
The meme has the audacity to then state: "You are not vaccinated, I respect your choice; I am vaccinated, respect my choice."
I do. I just ask you to do the same. That's all.
There's one crucial difference between both requests though: I don't have the backing of an armed government threatening you to take away access to everything, in case you don't comply.
The meme continues:
"I'm vaccinated, not to please the government but:
- To not die from COVID-19"
Chances of that are extremely low, even if you've accepted that Covid is indeed the cause of death in all the reported cases.
(See: bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-18/99-of-those-who-died-from-virus-had-other-illness-italy-says)
- "To not clutter a hospital bed if I get sick"
Hospitals aren't all overwhelmed, that's just fear mongering propaganda.
Hospitals are being shut down, actually, they have been throughout the crisis, at least in Germany, so if there should occur a shortage of beds, there's a concrete reason.
The state doesn't give a shit about your health, that's why the health service receives low funding and is usually the first sector where funding is being cut. Hence, it is usually overwhelmed, in some places more (like in Italy, where the propaganda began) in some less.
- "To not have to do PCR or antigenic tests to go out dancing, go to a restaurant, go on holidays and many more things to come."
I don't want to test all the time either. Just think about how insane the notion is to either get tested or injected, just to be able to do these things again.
It's insane! I know when I'm healthy. Yet you've been convinced I don't.
Think about this fact alone: there are now no more healthy people in society unless they prove it.
The meme concludes:
- "To hug those I love"
I hug everyone, and have been doing so since March 2020, and will do so for the rest of my life.
Unless they don't want it, of course.
- "To live my life"
Maybe our lives depend too much on fun and short-term amusement, that we'd seriously consider getting juiced to be able to live our lives.
- "To have a child go back to school and play sports."
Sending any child to school under these circumstances is child abuse.
- "To protect those I do and don’t know"
You aren't. For all the above mentioned reasons.
- "For COVID-19 to be a memory"
Switch the TV off.