Stream inquire about has contributed just unassumingly to general environmental hypothesis. In addition, the rate of age of new thoughts in stream nature may have impeded as of late. These deficiencies may be cured by a more consider push to produce new, innovative thoughts regarding streams that will upgrade their utilization in creating general hypothesis. The imaginative procedure has been completely contemplated by clinicians and, while the field is still in transition, most psychological therapists concur that juxtaposition of divergent ideas or perceptions can invigorate new thoughts. How this method may upgrade stream environment is delineated with a relationship between practical morphology and stream nature. Meaning of frame and capacity in streams is required to build up this relationship and a various leveled, scale-subordinate approach is basic. The impact of structure and setup of stream channels on their working is a promising examination zone that can be connected at a few scales. Parallels with scene nature are solid. Stretching out this similarity to bigger scales advises us that streams are, generally, expanded frameworks; in any case, little research has been done on the biological outcomes of spreading designs in streams and waterways. Mix of this extended picture with other surface and subsurface water bodies prompts a considerably more extensive perspective of streams as planar frameworks, personally associating earthbound and oceanic environments along flowpaths. This investigation of thoughts regarding stream shape and its practical results recommends a few open doors for stream biology to add to general natural hypothesis. All the more vitally, this exertion recommends that the procedure of thought age is direct, available, and useful for both science and researcher.