While I agree with you, and Warren Buffet is an old dinosaur, I don't think its unreasonable to imagine a scenario where non-government backed crypto-currencies will come to a bad end. Blockchain will have far reaching consequences besides just money and finance anyway.
Can you not picture a future where governments make tokens of their own and issue them to the non-users now? How could today's projects compete with that kind of onboarding?
Additionally, a new IRS policy will be implemented in 2018. For tax purposes, any reception of cryptos for payments is a taxable event. The tax is proportional to the current value at the time. Therefore, not declaring your crypto as taxable income will now put you in jail. This is the evil empire pretty much pegging their awful currency to our beloved cryptos, and will likely be the largest hurdle of businesses accepting for payment.
Currency IMO is one of the lamest use cases of blockchain and I think the global blockchain revolution will have a lot more socially beneficial success with secure identity, communities, consensus, and voting.
IRS coin...for tax purposes..and I'm serious.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
hahaha No
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Sort of like Binance Coin and KuShares Coin? A reserve for the most feared agency in crypto. I'm not sure what the model would look like, but you might have a brilliant idea here...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
True. Government will definitely not want to lose out in this new arrangement. Let's wait and see what the IRS review will look like, especially as it relates to cryptocurrency.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit