Part of a hard-hitting Mod Squad of fresh new faces on Capitol Hill, and rolling right off the punches of racist presidential tweets, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is taking no prisoners. The latest victim of AOC's straight-shooting spitfire is Facebook's cypto heads.
The last two days have seen Facebook's cryptocurrency boss, David Marcus, face lawmakers to address widespread and rampant concerns surrounding the feasibility and implementation of Facebook's plans for it's Libra currency.
Libra, not truly a cryptocurrency due to its regulated nature, is a virtual currency that Facebook hopes to augment fiat currencies with, and provide an alternative to high transaction fees. However, it is not very clear as to who will control the currency and in which jurisdiction it can be regulated. This has raised red flags among financial watchdogs and policy makers alike.
To address those concerns, Congress has summoned Facebook representatives to answer questions in public hearings before the House Committee on Financial Services.
Yesterday, Congresswomen Ocasio-Cortez(NY) was given 5 mins for her line of questioning, and her grilling of Mr. Marcus sparked pressure from those who followed and may very well have derailed Facebook's Libra hopes altogether.
The Freshmen Representative from NY launched a series of insightful questioning, leading Marcus straight towards her concerns about the financial reserves which will underpin the digital currency.
Facebook has explained that Libra will be backed 'one for one' with existing stable currencies that will serve as a reserve which will be managed by The Libra Association, which is a consortium of organizations.
However, AOC fired back pointing out asset value of Libra is managed by mostly profit-driven corporations.
"So we are discussing a currency controlled by an undemocratically selected coalition of largely massive corporations."src
She asked Marcus if he felt that currency should be considered a 'public good' but his evasive answer about thinking sovereign currencies should remain sovereign didn't satisfy the Democrat. She pressed if he thought Libra should be a public good and without getting a direct response concluded that she should take that as a "No".
Moving on, AOC recalled Marcus' statement that he would be willing to take his salary in Libra, and questioned the risk of that proposition, mentioning the term 'scrip', a reference to the practice of companies paying their employees in a substitute tender that can only be redeemed at company stores, and often falls victim to price-gouging.
AOC then asked Marcus if he was concerned about that risk? and attempt to set up an inquire of the destabilizing nature of Facebook's history, before running out of time.
[you can watch the whole exchange here]
Damn, she's smart as hell and quite the attention grabber. Facebook SHOULD be scrutinized and held up on this project because they came out guns blazing when they should have given regulators much more information up front. They probably knew it was going to be an "as for forgiveness rather than permission" type scenario with lawmakers.
Too much power in the hands of too few companies is never good though.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Indeed @hotsauceislethal
Especially if regular people cannot have any influence over those companies.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Oh hey man long time no see! I want you to check out my most recent post about STEEM and let me know what you think.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Indeed @hotsauceislethal. Didn't hear from you in a while.
Thx for suggestion. I will check out your new post right away.
I also wanted to make some suggestion.
My impression is, that the hardest part of attracting attention on STEEMIT is the fact, that our audience have very little chance to actually find our publications. Lack of solid notification system is an obvious issue. And regardless how hard I would try - there is very little chance I would find out about your new interesting publications (my feed is just flooded with to many posts).
Please allow me to share some suggestion with you. If you would ever publish content related to blockchain, crypto, artificial intelligence, psychology etc. then perhaps you could simply send me memo with link to that post.
This way not only I would have a chance to read your publication, drop a comment but I will also `upvote it right away with almost 20k SP voting power (I also have almost 10k PAL tokens, which may give you some extra benefits is you're using PALnet.io)
Please let me know what do you think. This surely should sound like a interesting offer :))
Cheers, Piotr
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Dear @striderpunk
She did ask some valid questions.
Discussions regarding Libra and Facebook are very intense lately and I personally don't know yet what to think about it.
I'm mostly interested how FED and other central banks will react if they will realize that Libra is a threat for current financial system.
Personally I will not put my trust in Facebook and I don't think I will ever use Libra. However I will surely pay attention to this project as it may turn our financial world up-side-down....
Important question
I would like to ask you, and hopefully you would share your own opinion:For that reason alone I cannot see monetary system being changed much. Neither by libra or bitcoin or any other crypto. Debts, goverment expenses, trade oil - all of it will still require $$$.
What do you think? Upvote on the way.
Yours,
Piotr
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
So many gray areas in this department. Whats undeniable its that Libra is going to happen, wether we like it or not.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit