RE: Crypto hinders science?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Crypto hinders science?

in cryptocurrency •  7 years ago 

yes, and I never said his comment was not valid.
The justification for making any energy source should be in the costs of producing it to the output you get and cost to the consumer.
I believe it is possible to reduce all those costs. When examining the costs of this taken into account should also be environment impact be it on pollutants or destruction of environment wildlife.

Your topic touches on much more then just the science and the power usage, and leads down many roads of of communication with many side-roads off.

Choosing which road to travel first, Takes agreement. We can only hope comes before it is too late.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
  ·  7 years ago (edited)

@brayias still waiting for a white flag from you....
I didn't like how our conversation continued, so lets be civil and let bygones be the bygones....What you say???
Followed you....

@Xabi White flag: Excuse the late reply, I do not hold a grudge very well. I know what I am saying or trying to when I type, at times I forget the reader does not. On a positive note, Both our views toward similar items, The cost of doings things vs the rewards gained.

I just want friendly discussion here rather than anyone think they have done something wrong :) We have to think beyond monetary cost and value these days, despite what businesses and most politicians say. We live on a finite planet and so sustainability is key. I could go and live in a cave, but I accept some compromises :)