— SteemCN

If you spent less time directly attacking me and more time addressing my points, this would be a more productive conversation.

Almost all the posts I write are posts where I talk about projects I like, and when I write a post on something I see an issue in, people like you call FUD. Guess what, you can point out issues in specific projects without it being FUD.

I will explain it to you one more time... a daily staking reward of over 10% is not sustainable. You are essentially doubling the supply every few days and without having a large enough increase in demand to meet this increase, you will see more and more of a value drop as the sell volume increases.

This is enough of an issue to me that I consider it a bad investment.

You don't know my background so please don't assume to know it. (Assumption is not part of the scientific process, by the way).
Using scientific process to evaluate non scientific subjects yields unreliable results. Good luck evaluating history with a scientific process, for example.
If you find one major flaw in a project, you should be entitled to declare the project as a whole as a project that shouldn't be invested in. A project could be absolutely amazing in all aspects apart from having one major issue and that could be good enough reason to not invest.
This is my post, I am entitled to share my opinion (which turn out to be accurate by the way) on it.
Just because you disagree with somebody doesn't mean you should insult them. You can disagree and still be civil. Ad hominem attacks are a lazy form of arguement.
At this point, considering all your comments are pretty much saying the same thing. It could be considered as spam. Unless you decide you are capable of having a friendly disagreement, please stop, I won't be answering anymore aggressive and repetitive messages.

RE: Don't buy Embercoin!

You are viewing a single comment's thread from: