You don't know my background so please don't assume to know it. (Assumption is not part of the scientific process, by the way).

Using scientific process to evaluate non scientific subjects yields unreliable results. Good luck evaluating history with a scientific process, for example.

If you find one major flaw in a project, you should be entitled to declare the project as a whole as a project that shouldn't be invested in. A project could be absolutely amazing in all aspects apart from having one major issue and that could be good enough reason to not invest.

This is my post, I am entitled to share my opinion (which turn out to be accurate by the way) on it.

Just because you disagree with somebody doesn't mean you should insult them. You can disagree and still be civil. Ad hominem attacks are a lazy form of arguement.

At this point, considering all your comments are pretty much saying the same thing. It could be considered as spam. Unless you decide you are capable of having a friendly disagreement, please stop, I won't be answering anymore aggressive and repetitive messages.