Bitcoin forks, a cancer that can destroy BitcoinsteemCreated with Sketch.

in cryptocurrency •  7 years ago 

Money can not be created out of thin air

I wrote many times that Bitcoin community should get together and decide the future of Bitcoin. While, at first glance it might seem that new coins are being created and you can sell for profits, or to buy new bitcoin coins, long term effect might not be as good as one might see.

Satoshi Nakamoto vision for Bitcoin was to create a world currency that can not be manipulated by a central government or inflated to infinity. Within the code, there will be a limit of 21 million bitcoin that can be ever create. Meaning that Bitcoin can not be inflated. Still code can not block the number of forks, every time the chain split, there will be double number of coins in both splits.

Most governments increase the amount of currency in circulation by a few percentage every year, and that caused great inequality. 200% increase in one year alone, not including the number of bitcoin mined, won't have good long term effects.

It all started with Bitcoin cash

Bitcoin Cash was a successful Bitcoin fork, which laid the first nail in the coffin. No doubt whoever bought Bitcoin made a great deal of money. In theory forks are just like stocks splits. When stocks split, it means that there will be double number or shares, with half the price. There is no gain during splits. On the other hand when bitcoin splits, the total value of Bitcoin main chain plus value of splitted chain should be equal to whatever was before the split. To simplify it, if new forked coin is valued $500, bitcoin should drop by $500, so the total should be the same.

This did not happen with Bitcoin cash, and I knew that it is not a good sign. Bitcoin miners and holders will have incentive to fork Bitcoin again for free profits. My fear came true, not even two months later, Bitcoin forked again, bitcoin Gold.

Long term effects of Forks

As I mentioned earlier, forks will not have good long term effects on cryptocurrency. There are many reasons, the main one is that most of the time forks are not beneficial, they don't bring anything new. It's the same chain. I'm not a technology expert, my understanding is that a new fork has just a few different parameters. It does not bring something revolutionary.

Other reasons are that a new chain split has to be mined the same way as the old one. There is a limited number of miners so the new fork will draw mining power out of main chain, making cryptocurrency vulnerable from network attacks.

Other reason is economics and psychology. When people invest they want security. New splits make it harder to chose which chain is the real deal and which one is not. Which to sell and which to keep. This can lead to serious investors moving away from Bitcoin and investing in more stable cryptocurrencies where development team works together for a better future.

All I can say to forks is this


Image source Bitcoin.com

Follows and upvotes are appreciated :)


Disclaimer: The information contained herein is author's opinion, does not purport to be comprehensive and is strictly for information purposes only. This is not a financial advice. It should not be regarded as investment/trading advice.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I'm glad more people are become aware of the inherent risk of the fork-mania we are currently in.

However, the present situation stems directly from the rigid stance of the main developer team behind bitcoin, also known as Bitcoin Core, towards increasing the block size limit from 1mb to 2mb.

There is at least on peer-reviewed research paper from Cornell that stated that blocks up to 4mb will not have any detrimental impact on node operators and decentralization.

But this kind of scientific research was brushed aside by the Core team, and now we have two different chains.

So, as I see it, forks are how the community handles irreconcilable differences. Weather this is a long-term net negative for the crypto space remains to be seen.

I'm glad more people are becoming aware of the inherent risk of the fork-mania we are currently in.

However, the present situation stems directly from the rigid stance of the main developer team behind bitcoin, also known as Bitcoin Core, towards increasing the block size limit from 1mb to 2mb.

There is at least on peer-reviewed research paper from Cornell that stated that blocks up to 4mb will not have any detrimental impact on node operators and decentralization.

But this kind of scientific research was brushed aside by the Core team, and now we have two different chains.

So, as I see it, forks are how the community handles irreconcilable differences. Weather this is a long-term net negative for the crypto space remains to be seen.

You have a point, this makes me think. thanks for this post.@cryptouniverse

Calling @originalworks :)
img credz: pixabay.com
Nice, you got a 8.0% @minnowbooster upgoat, thanks to @ahuruglica
Want a boost? Minnowbooster's got your back!

It's an inflation regarding forking from the original chain. What's next after Bitcoin Gold?
I think that this is bad press for BTC

It's an inflation regarding forking from the original chain. What's next after Bitcoin Gold?
I think that this is bad press for BTC

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

Introduce this bitcoincold I hope it won't affect bit of crypto... let wait and see

Follow U..