Could this one be the last?
As we speak a new signaling period for SegWit has just started. So far 100% of the blocks have indicated that miners are in support of SegWit.
If at least 95% of blocks during this 2,016 block period signal that they are in support for the change, it will lock in on the Bitcoin network.
A lock-in would mean that the new code would be activated.
What is SegWit?
I am sure you have heard the term SegWit thrown around quite a bit recently, but what exactly is SegWit?
Broken down, SegWit literally means segregate and witnesses. Segregate means to separate and Witnesses are the signatures to transactions, so basically SegWit means to separate transaction signatures.
It was originally formulated by Dr. Pieter Wuille in 2015.
According to Investopedia, SegWit can be defined as follows:
"The process by which the block size limit on a blockchain is increased by removing signature data from Bitcoin transactions. When certain parts of a transaction are removed, this frees up space or capacity to add more transactions to the chain."
I am sure you can already guess why that might be important to Bitcoin, as the block size limit has been at the heart of the scaling debate ever since it first came up in 2014.
How much will it help?
In a given transaction the digital signature accounts for 65% of the space. SegWit will ignore the data attached to a signature by stripping off the signature from within the input and move it to a structure towards the end of a transaction.
In doing so, the block size limit would get increased from 1 MB to just under 4 MB, although this number is subject to debate as others claim that it wouldn't increase the block size limit to more than 2 MB.
Another benefit?
Not only would this increase the block size limit (the actual amount is up for debate) but it would also remove the ability of a receiver to intercept and modify a sender's transaction ID in order to get more coins from the sender than was originally intended.
The reason for this is because the digital signature would no longer be attached to the input.
More about this can be read here:
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/segwit-segregated-witness.asp
So, in effect, it would clean up the network and make things harder to game for unscrupulous individuals.
How long will it take to implement?
As long as the miners continue to signal above that 95% threshold, SegWit would lock-in about 2 weeks from now.
Specifically, SegWit would lock-in at block 479,808, which would be around August 8th.
You can check this link out for a more in depth look at the scaling issues and possible solutions:
https://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-scaling-watch-news-guides-navigate-coming-clash-code/
Stay informed my friends!
Sources:
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/segwit-segregated-witness.asp
https://www.coindesk.com/new-segwit-signaling-period-started-mining-pools-signaling/
Image Sources:
https://www.cryptocompare.com/coins/guides/what-is-segwit/
https://decentralize.today/litecoiners-expect-segwit-for-january-2017-8b5300636a56
https://www.coindesk.com/new-segwit-signaling-period-started-mining-pools-signaling/
Follow me: @jrcornel
Thank you for thorough explanation!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah but do we really want SegWit?
In short, SegWit can flip the incentives for some (bandwidth restricted) miners such that they benefit from not downloading or verifying the transaction signatures. For a user, this causes a SegWit transaction to be less secure than a non-segwit one. A non-SegWit transaction is secure with the assumption that no attack is able to obtain more than 51% of the network hashrate. With SegWit, this becomes 51% - (percent of miners with flipped incentives).
If 20% of miners end up in a situation where they are not downloading signatures because it is more profitable for them not to, a 31% miner can attack the network effectively. Security becomes 51% - X.
The bigger problem is that it is very hard to estimate the proportion of miners with this flip in incentives before their portion grows too large and an attack occurs. This basically means that SegWit transactions will always be less secure than normal Bitcoin P2PKH transactions. Even if just by the smallest bit, this is what fundamentally breaks the fungibility of Bitcoin.
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@kyle.anderson/fork-christ-s-sake-bitcoin-is-going-to-fork-is-segwit-bitcoin-whose-side-should-i-be-on
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
if I get it right, segwit will lead the way for other alt coins to take over bitcoins. Let's say that altcoin is more secure than bitcoin, it opens for any other coins as asset to jump start its revival.
Let's wait and see.
Hope it never happens.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It would be good spectator sport to see segwit happen only to be tested by a 51% attacked.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You wrote an interesting story, super!
Two thumbs up for you.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Too bad this Bitcoin Cash is happening, ruining the party for the time beeing ....
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Interesting days ahead. segwit plus the hardfork on 1 Aug should keep us all 'entertained'!! Hopefully things can calm down after that although I doubt it will. Looks like an eventful
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Segwit will lock in this signaling period and bitcoin cash will fall hard by AUG 2.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Come on August 8th! It will be nice to have a small win for bitcoin on the technical side. Something tells me some sideline money is waiting for that date too.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Im looking forward to faster transactions! Can't wait til they include the lightning network
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
all the best to BITCOIN holder
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks jrcornel, I'm in education and we say "repetition, repetition, repetition" I've seen this info but for all us "newbies" to Blockchain it is good to see things over and over from a different angle and a different poster.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Amazing post
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hope it's the last.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
looking forward to it's benefits. I don't wanna focus on it's odds or negative side
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
https://steemit.com/advice/@chukamozie/the-lady-bug
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for this important information.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
So Segwit is all about removing signature from the block chain to free up space so bitcoin can perform more transaction. If I am correct that can be great.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That makes it no longer Bitcoin. The original version of Bitcoin is going to fork off on Aug 1 (BitcoinCash)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
So much happening all at once in the world of cryptocurrency! Thank you for this valuable post. Segwit is making a lot of sense now.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
very good science @jrcornel
follow back oke
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Very informative post. Hopefully the SegWit will prove to be a great improvement to the network!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What happens if SegWit does not lock in?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Then back to the drawing board... :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I thought you high REP dudes were supposed to be more optimistic.
The straight news isn't always so welcomed. LOL
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Whether it does or not, it will be the weaker fork after Aug 1 when a bunch of miners split off to Bitcoin Cash fork.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It will lock in. Bip 91 which locked in a few days ago requires all miners to signal for segwit.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I can't wait for Segwit anymore, it will be HUGE change for Bitcoin and actually for all cryptocurrencies. All users will be satisfied, because transactions will be faster and cheaper. So it's everything we really need! :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It really is a very good post and information
i like it
followed you @jrcornel :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The argument against that approach is that research in this area is still underdeveloped, though Garzik has argued SegWit could fail to introduce the capacity changes promised by those who have championed its integration.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for breaking segwit down. Best explanation I've seen.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
About time for some:
Happy HODLING everyone.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
👍👍👍👍👍
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Awesome post.
What the difference between Segwit and Segwit2x (BIP91)? OR is there no difference?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
They are pretty similar, but read the answers in this for some technical differences:
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/54728/how-is-segwit2x-different-from-segwit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There's quite a couple of information I didn't knew about.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Awesome! Glad I could help. Which part specifically? :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Things will cool down after 1st August.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, well sort of. It's gonna be wild for the next couple months after it as well. The Bitcoin scaling problem isn't likely to be solved come August 1st.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Foarte interesant @jrcornel!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@jrcornel, that was an interesting post. Thank you very much.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for clarifying SegWit @jrcornel. I have been trying to wrap my head around it for days.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
i appreciate your post
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hey @jrcornel , I have started a podcast recently where I interview other entrepreneurs.
The podcast is on my youtube channel, and here is the playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5CpCNPna6p95oJfKPew0N3ZT0k-khdgg
We talk about what you are currently doing in life, your business as well as your journey and any lessons or advice you want the world to know.
A casual conversation about entrepreneurship, and, about you.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This is a cool post.
I will follow and vote you,
I expect the same from you.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit