I dunno if I like Ripple. It feels like something built by the banks for the banks. Why do you feel a blockchain should be more centralised?
RE: Saudi Arabia's central bank signs blockchain deal with Ripple
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Saudi Arabia's central bank signs blockchain deal with Ripple
Well I read a good theory once that Ripple, Stellar, etc. was designed and built to exchange via ICO BTC for something of less worth, allowing the banks to hoard BTC. I don't think a blockchain should be centralized, but I do believe that the current money transfer system is broken. Unfortunately both BTC and ETH are a little expensive on transactions and too slow.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Cool I suggest edit your article. You can update an article after publishing it if you click edit. In your article you said:"Now I personally think a blockchain should be more centralised, but value ..." :)
Just saying. I think ethereum will get faster when they implement sharding, I also think bitcoin transaction fees are allot less now and with lighting payments things will get better in terms of transaction speed.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hahaha only saw that now. Edited thanks!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit