I wonder if this venomous article is a way to appease your audience who were told about the monkey capital project and subsequently invested? The interviewer expressed genuine awe at what was being proposed and his enthusiasm was hard to ignore.
Have you tried asking Harrison with an attitude of genuine curiosity, instead of coming at him on the attack?
I invested in MC at a high price and subsequently went through a roller coaster of emotions . It was my first ICO and the goldseek interview was a huge factor in my decision to invest.
Am I disappointed at the way it's panned out? Sure. I was a very vocal critic until I joined the MC slack group and saw that Harrison isn't running into the hills with bags of btc...
Take these facts into consideration:
A $500k domain investment.
The purchase of an existing and stable block chain platform to host all monkey capital assets. (ZUR)
Appointment of a media manager.
Daily updates to investors in the slack group.
White paper updates.
A coding project to create a platform to interface with the new MC blockchain. No expense was spared to find someone with proven results (pipdroid trading app) and they're working round the clock to get the platform up and running.
And there's more..
Why would a scammer do any of this?
Chris, I urge you to call a truce and spend some time getting to know the guy that you are insulting in this article. Maybe even another interview?
You might be surprised at what you find out re: the work going on behind the scenes.