It's all about how you say it.
Seriously, you can't see the duplicity in that statement? That you have to walk on eggshells, stay in line, or you get gang-rushed and obliterated? What kind of ethical compass do you have? Its absurd.
Very Wrong Ver is a technical argument, because Ver has been wrong, and will continue being wrong.
Misrepresenting his ego-project as something else is just one facet of his wrongness.
But naturally, you're staring at the bark -- missing the forest all around you. I find this is a common trait with Very Wrong Ver's disciples, trading short-term "fixes" for long-term sustainability.
Sad.
No, not really. I don't think I've ever done that. When I forcefully disagree, I forcefully disagree. Perhaps I'm just more picky with what I choose to get agitated over and how I express myself by default? I don't know for sure, but you're messages in general would certainly seem to imply this.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Moving the goalposts again, I see.
We're talking about Very Wrong Ver's sub-reddit -- and his followers actively swamp any post that is not to their liking with aggressive downvotes.
Are you drunk? This is the second time you've played the fool -- unless you're always like this.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You are equivocating dislikes (which btw are easily sockpuppeted and should largely be ignored anyway in todays social media climate) in combination with open mod logs, with highly unfair selective bans in combination with closed mod logs.
Do you see how this might look a little... stupid?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit