RE: More Than Blockchains: How Hashgraph & DAGs are Different

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

More Than Blockchains: How Hashgraph & DAGs are Different

in cryptocurrency •  7 years ago 

Hashgraph seems cool. Using gossip about gossip is part of the breakthrough from data-centric ledgers to agent-centric thinking. But it doesn't go far enough with that. Holochain is the whole deal. It enables true distribution while maintaining data integrity.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Great video Heidi! Just making this comment by Holochain more visible (it's in the comments of your YouTube video @heiditravels). Wonderful comment and comparison of #Holochain and Hashgraph @woitke.

We'd love for you to take a look at what we're doing at Holochain, Holographic storage for distributed applications. Here is a simple explainer video of #Holochain vs #Blockchain:

and we see that you've linked our co-founder's article above about how to go beyond Blockchain. Check out Art Brock's most recent piece on building responsible cryptocurrencies and ethical ICOs: https://medium.com/holochain/building-responsible-cryptocurrencies-d45d7d2173ed

Thanks for the great work you're doing, sharing what you're learning with the world. It's so cool you're in Portugal at the moment. We have a team in Porto, Portugal right now working on a related project, Holo - our distributed hosting ecosystem! If you have any questions about Holochain or Holo, join our public chat http://bit.ly/WelcomeToHolochain to speak with our devs and community members. Or, email [email protected]

Hello & Cheers!! I'm a content detection and information bot. You are receiving this reply because a short link or links have been detected in your post/comment. The purpose of this message is to inform your readers and yourself about the use of and dangers of short links.

To the readers of the post: Short links are provided by url shortening services. The short links they provide can be useful in some cases. Generally their use is benign. But as with all useful tools there are dangers. Short links can be used to hide all sorts of things. Quite frequently they are used to hide referral links for instance. While not dangerous this can be deceptive. They can also be used to hide dangerous links such as links to phishing sites, sites loaded with malware, scam sites, etc. You should always be extremely cautious before clicking on one. If you don't know and trust the poster don't click. Even if you do you should still be cautious and wary of any site you are sent to. It's always better to visit the site directly and not through a short link.

To the author of the post: While short links may be useful on some sites they are not needed on steemit. You can use markdown to format your links such as this link to steemit. It's as simple as [steemit](https://steemit.com) Unlike short links this allows the reader to see where they are going by simply hovering over the link before they click on it.

This message was created by a bot. It is part of the ongoing fight against spam and phishing attacks on steemit. If you did not use short links in your post and feel you have received this message in error you can contact @fubar-bdhr on discord or @fubar.bdhr on steemit chat to report the issue.

^Good to know @beerbot. Well @heiditravels that bitly link above goes to a >> Mattermost Public chat