Over the last month I have witnessed some excellent discussions brewing on the STEEM blockchain and in the discords. Game changing discussions. About delegation, upvote bots, circle-voting, flagging, and the reward pool. I’ve seen witnesses, whales, and large groups of minnows engaged in genuine discord (not the platform, but the back and forth discussions where people didn’t agree and that’s okay).
One thing that has come up in several of the discussions that I witnessed is that the STEEM blockchain needs readers.
We call readers curators but often times curators need to blog if they want to earn STEEM, because there isn’t much STEEM in curation alone when you first get here.
So, let’s start there. When people first come to the blockchain, who are they? It’s hard to build a persona, so I don’t want to try - I’ll leave that to the statistical experts - but in a very broad sense people are either bloggers or they are not. 
Not everyone is a blogger. I think I am safe in saying that. I may even be safe in saying not everyone is a commentor. If you don’t believe I am on solid ground with that leap, you can tune me out. If you are still with me, my point is that some people are just predisposed to curate when they get here.
Personally I got less than a penny’s worth of STEEM Power (SP) for any curations I did when I first got here. The best I did was 0.007 SP for a single curation, and had way more curations that resulted in 0 reward than 0.001 SP or more. I also made a small investment in the platform early on, a couple mBtc - nothing major, but having never cracked 35SP in my first month, I felt my curation was pretty much unrewarded. 
Dan, the co-founder of STEEM blockchain, had this to say about minnow curation, “Curation is a game for whales and dolphins. Minnows are unlikely to earn any significant return on their votes. Minnows should stick to posting and commenting.” https://steemit.com/steem/@dantheman/curation-rewards-and-voting-incentive.
I agree with him, as things are right now, but his statement has me asking a question: what is a predisposed curator doing? Are they blogging? Commenting? Leasing delegation? Or leaving? If they are blogging or commenting, I wonder if that is benefitting the blockchain? If they are leasing delegation - are they making STEEM or losing it? Are they selling votes? Are they blogging and self-voting with leased SP? Are they circle-voting with leased SP? I hope they’re not leaving. But, I don’t blame anyone for any decisions, I don’t judge and I won’t moralize the question. I want to ask a different question:
What if there was a way to reward a pure curator? One that spreads the vote around and doesn’t self vote, circle-vote, or sell vote. Reward those minnows with increased delegation, because their contribution to the community is what keeps the content creators around. 
Raise the quality of the blockchain by offering the curator enough incentive that they aren’t forced to do something that degrades its quality. The net positive done by a pure curator raises the profile of the STEEM blockchain and makes it more appealing to investors. The pure curator is just what the STEEM blockchain needs, so I hope we can give them a path to success.
And, it’s actually already happening! The other night on MSP Waves, I heard an announcement that several minnows were made instant dolphins by some free delegation thanks to some very kind (and I would say forward thinking) individuals. I don’t want to get it wrong, but I think Stellabelle then fulltimegeek gifted the dolphin making delegations and maybe some others added to it. I was blown away to hear it. Those that received delegation promised enthusiastic responsible curation and I know they will do it. Could this start a trend? I can only hope.
Thank you to any that are experimenting with such delegations, because the service you are doing for the long-term good of the blockchain is incalculable. To any thinking about experimenting similarly - remember this about delegations: A delegation can be reclaimed at any time by the delegator. You can make sure that your gift is in good hands at all times.
Thanks everyone and keep steeming!
Image credits: pixabay special thanks to these photographers
https://pixabay.com/en/users/coyot-2009089/
https://pixabay.com/en/users/kalhh-86169/
https://pixabay.com/en/users/derneuemann-6406309/
https://pixabay.com/en/users/QuinceMedia-1031690/
https://pixabay.com/en/users/6072518-6072518/
I'm delegating to send minnows so they can spread the voting. I don't expect anything in return. At this stage steemit needs more people earning, not a few making big money.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think that's great. I am sure that the delegation means a lot to those you give it to. I won a random draw at a 500 SP delegation for 4 weeks 24 days ago and it meant the world to me. I have been dropping into the 'new' tab frequently in search of posts.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
True story.
I see so many people who joined during that wave I came in on who have left because they see how unbalanced the platform is- these are people who spend quality time creating original articles. People who bring new concepts and thought processes to the community.
I quit after a few months. I admit it. But I came back because I believe in the power and unlimited potential. However, it can very easily sway the other way...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"At this stage steemit needs more people earning, not a few making big money."
YES! That! The power needs to be distributed. We have enough issues with wealth and power distribution being bad in the real world. Steemit deserves to be above that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you, @steemitgraven29, for this excellent piece.
You have echoed what I've been saying for many months, in comments and articles, but more than that--you've said it with clarity and gone beyond what I've imagined by offering some clear and immediately actionable suggestions for making it happen.
It seems so obvious to me - we can't all be writers! We don't all want to be!
Steemit desperately needs a vast army of readers who curate, and who do it well. Then we'll begin to see the obscure, overlooked gems of talent rising to the place they belong on trending pages. Then we'll see hard working authors of excellence begin to be rewarded for their quality content.
😄😇😄
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you creatr. A vast army of readers would be wonderful - especially if they curate well. I look forward to the day :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree completely. I'm pulling my brains out trying to come up with an idea for this too. The MSP initiatives are really good but we need something much broader.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you - I agree that the broader the better when it comes to encouraging our curators.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I wholeheartedly agree. Curation is important, and should be rewarded. On many platforms, you're actually expected to comment and engage with existing content before publishing your own. Which makes sense - it's how people learn and understand the platform before contributing to it. On steemit it seems to be the other way around. If you do not publish or invest money, your votes will never mean much.
There are more readers than writers in the world, and they should have the power to reward GOOD writers.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you. I think we need to take care of our curators from the beginning. Before they invest and before they feel forced to post.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
An excellent post!
Some of us have been saying similar for a while.
@curie pays its curators, and now delegations are being given to folks who wish to 'curate for you' and the Steem Blockchain.
I hope this movement will grow, as it really does benefit everyone at the end of the day.
Cheers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you. I have high hopes for this as well.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
They should incentivise curation more, like 50/50 instead of 75/25. I'm surtain it will prevent a lot of certain it will prevent a lot of selfvotes! Writers happy, investors happy!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think they have experimented with a few different ratios and equations when it comes to finding a writer/reader balance. I am not sure what the best is. I only hope like you - that they can find a way to make everyone happy - because I think this has the potential to be the best platform for writers and readers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I spend most of my time reading and upvoting when I have more than a penny to give. I know I am not alone on being a reader and there are many who give of their time for a project like this.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Here's a whole bunch of tips to do better and grow your steemit vote. If you got to rep 49 and like to curate - this will really help you now. You can do it and succeed here. Good luck!
Make Money Blogging on Steemit Top Tips and Checklist for Better Results!!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for being a reader. Writers and readers need each other. I appreciate you.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think the difference between curators and bloggers is followers. Some people who come to this platform as bloggers with a preexisting following easily start posting.
When i first joined i didn't know much about blogging and I am still learning how. I have things to say but no following and so the wise advice of @aggroed was "if you dont have a reputation, wait until you have built up a couple of hundred followers before you start blogging all your greatest material and getting .. crickets."
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, that is the advice I have heard as well. But I wonder about the people that follow a blogger to this platform - how will they fit in?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I cannot say. But I think that consistency of presence goes a long way. When you read through the steamit posts you start to see people who consistently work on this platform. I try to make sure I spend some time here everyday. There is almost always something interesting to find. Its interesting to notice the waves of interest with price. What I love about this platform that gets me through the ups and downs of price is that every time you work on it you get to increase your share. So the dollar value may not be going up but my Steem Power progressively does. Its hard to find a liquid investment that compounds well and even harder to find one that allows you to contribute both cash and sweat equity. For me personally, that's why I think its worth waiting for Steemit and I think that on the way I will find other like minded people. I am sure it will be a niche group but again that is another strength of the platform. Something for everyone.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
having only 25 Steem Power (5 of which I have delegated to dMania) my votes do not add any visible $$$ to the the post however when I upvote, comment or resteem it still eventually adds value to that post. and the Creators still get encouraged on a small level. If anything, the fact that there's some activity on a post will encourage others to check it out too. I am also a very big creator that is not going to use Bot Voting (although I tried when I first joined just to see the results). So, I have to be persistent and have realistic expectations of the type of exposure I will get in the beginning. I understand this very well but unfortunately many new Steemians won't be as persistent and will join and leave. I am encouraged by all of the 3rd party sites like dtube,dlive,dsound,dmania and Lucksacks poker to name a few which will allow more divers creators an avenue to post and express themselves and get more attention. But being new, you can't just expect to be making money or have much of an influence on the Platform until you've proven yourself to be a good Steemit Citizen and shown support for those who have built it up to where it is today. I do however look forward to the day that I can start to reward all of the amazing Artists and Creators on Steemit !I just thought you would find some of my opinions as a newer member interesting. Thanks for reading :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for reading :) I appreciate your time. Yes, we do have to be persistent in order to succeed. I try apply that philosophy to everything I do. I will take some time to investigate all those 3rd party sites you mentioned - I have not heard of all of them. All I hope is that there is an avenue to success for a pure reader, as there is one for a pure writer, with enough persistence.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think whales should delegate to minnows that is responsible. Not many can do it and some just stick to their circle jerk.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The good news is that if a whale saw their delegation being used in this manner - they can undelegate. This would leave the delegations in the hands of those that treat them well.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
100% agree. I’m a minnow with intention of blogging. But I see the same gap in the steem platform. If it’s only for bloggers, than the curation and upvotes may be imbalanced. We need to give the “professional” readers and curators a path to success here without forcing them to write and comment. I think it would lead to more diverse and equalized success for all steemians.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes. A path to success for all is exactly what the blockchain needs for balance. Thank you.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That is definitely good news, and exactly what the platform needs. Awesome post.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you. I hope we're right.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This kind of post whats needed at the moment, you have articulated your points and they all have merits.... It would interesting to get the opinions of whales, especially thoughts..
Timely and content driven post...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks. I, too, hope we can get the opinion of whales. I guess we shall see with time.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I have a friend who is purely a curator. She works full time, cares for a family, then comes here to curate relevant articles to her niche. She provides an amazing service which is very well received. But she makes very little, and is doing this from sheer love and the potential future growth.
But if something happens before her time is worth the effort all may be lost. It is very unbalanced and frankly kinda sad. The way I see it is we are all here for a common goal, and as such should all be working for the greater good of the community.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I hope your friend can make more doing a service like this, before something comes along and she leaves the platform. Please tell her "Thank you" for me. I really hope she gets discovered and gets a shot at some delegated SP. That would be the best thing for everyone - if more people curated from a place of sheer love and potential future growth. Thank you for sharing this.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you so much. I am sending her this screenshot, I know it will be a great motivator :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Not everyone is a blogger. I think I am safe in saying that. I may even be safe in saying not everyone is a commentor. If you don’t believe I am on solid ground with that leap, you can tune me out. If you are still with me, my point is that some people are just predisposed to curate when they get here
I agree. This account is run by me ( @chelsea88 ) as a curation account for primarily east coast Steemians. We also have a small but growing discord and hoping for meetings amongst east coasters down the line. I think curators should get more for what they are doing but at the same time the content creators will always get a bigger piece of the pie, obviously. We do Need more actual readers. In the past I have suggested a person would need to be in a post at least two minutes (to encourage actual reading) before they could just click and move on. Nothing more weird to me to see someone upvote a post within a minute of me posting that say took me an hour to write. They clearly didn't read it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's fantastic - I love that people find a way to come together through this platform. There are a lot of east coasters - you will surely grow. When I see a quick vote - I wonder at the same thing. Thanks for taking the time to reply. I appreciate it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you!! And, sure thing. I know quality content when i see it 😉
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Excellent post and well made points. It is all well and good creating worthy content, but for it to have true worth it needs to be consumed and curated, the curators earning more for their efforts.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you. I like what you say about 'true worth,' because it is spot on. There has to be a balance.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
this is a very insightful post... And the delegations are extremely helpful. I was the fortunate winner of the third Man ( make a minnow) delegation through minnow support project. I was provided 10000 SP for one month which I used in October to curate is often and is heartily as I could. It was a great experience and I enjoyed rewarding bloggers with that little bit of extra upvote that the delegated SP provided. Your post is excellent, thank you for sharing. I have followed you and Resteemed this post. Keep up the good work!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you! I am sure you made a difference for the posts you found with your delegation. I won a 500 SP 4 week delegation and dropped my 5 cents on everyone I could! It is very fun.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes! It was so much fun and I'm glad to hear that you were delegated 500sp at one point to it kind of gives you a taste of what the future can hold for us. It was very nice to meet you today in the chat!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by steemitgraven29 from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews/crimsonclad, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows and creating a social network. Please find us in the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@originalworks
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The @OriginalWorks bot has determined this post by @steemitgraven29 to be original material and upvoted(1.5%) it!
To call @OriginalWorks, simply reply to any post with @originalworks or !originalworks in your message!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit