How much work a curator puts in is up to the individual curator. Just because one is a curator doesn't automatically mean they put in great amounts of work into the process.
The exact same argument could be applied to a writer.
Further as I said before the percentage for curation is the sum of multiple people's work. Even if it were smaller amounts of work, multiplied by 50 or 100 it may be the same or greater.
On the first part, we agree.
And parts of my understanding of how Steemit's blockchain works is a little defunct, so I'll defer to you on that one. As someone who puts as much effort into authoring as I do curating, I personally believe it is fair the author gets the larger piece of the pie. Maybe its due to this that I think primarily from that perspective, and not so much from that of an author who does not. If authors didn't put as much effort into their posts, and neither did the curators, or if authors did and so did the curators, then a 50:50 setup would look more in place in such a system.
Also, how are you quoting my text?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Just cut and paste it and put a ">" in front of it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Ohhh, nice. That'll come in handy in future word-to-word engagements.
Thanks m8 ;)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit