Startcrowd: a Blockchain network for Artificial Intelligence projects

in data •  7 years ago  (edited)

Startcrowd is a social network facilitating AI projects. On Startcrowd, requesters can post their projects, and other participants can complete them. In a future iteration of Startcrowd, project contributors will be able to get paid with a blockchain token. The Startcrowd product is already launched (without the blockchain feature).

Current projects cover various applications of artificial intelligence, like smart agriculture, green energy, or drug discovery. There are also projects in fundamental research, combining Boltzmann machines and ergodic theory. More examples can be found on the Startcrowd website.

The AI for drug discovery project is the most active, with one research paper. Drug discovery is a popular theme on crowdsourcing platforms (Innocentive, Open-Source Drug Discovery, Dream Challenges…), and it’s also an important topic on Startcrowd.

Types of projects: open-source or proprietary

Open-source is the default posting mode. Keeping a project open-source allows to maximize visibility, and minimize the barrier of entry for potential contributors.

Proprietary projects are also possible on Startcrowd. This option can be chosen by entrepreneurs willing to build Intellectual Property. In this case, requesters can select contributors for their private project, and they can make them sign Non-Disclosure Agreements.

It might seem hazardous to crowdsource proprietary innovation to strangers around the world. However, with the help of a well-executed rating system, this practice will certainly become widespread, like sleeping at an AirBnB home, or jumping into an Uber car.

It might be good to recall that an open-source project is not necessarily unpaid: sometimes, it can be sponsored. Likewise, a proprietary project is not always paid: labor can often be performed in exchange of the mere hope for a future job or equity. That’s how unpaid internships are functioning.

How participants will earn Startcrowd tokens

Tokens can bring incentives to diverse tasks, including:

Building data science models, and the software around them (front-end…)

Selling data for training models

Powering computations of data scientists

Staking to secure the proof-of-stake Startcrowd blockchain

Providing consulting services. Experts can help define the problem, collect the data, price the project, or settle Intellectual Property disputes. A new class of consulting services will emerge for Startcrowd, akin to Search Engine Optimization for Google, or Social Media Marketing for Facebook.

Why blockchain?

Using a blockchain allows the full decentralization of the network. Traditional crowdsourcing platforms often suffer from friction between a decentralized crowd and a centralized platform.

A token also facilitates shared ownership. This should reduce the risk of building an exploitative platform, which can always happen for uberization projects.

The specific form of the token is not decided yet. It might be built on top of Ethereum, on top of an Ethereum competitor, or be a completely independent blockchain. This topic remains to be discussed by potential users and crypto-investors.

Why now?

There is a growing demand for data science services. It is predicted that demand for data scientists will soar 28% from 2017 to 2020.

On the supply side, there are increasingly more data scientists, trained with online courses.

However, this new supply and demand don’t always match. It’s hard to find a job after having completed online courses. Students have to overcome a lot of barriers, for which they were not prepared. They have to apply for a job, relocate where the job is, and then commute to the office every morning.

Startcrowd vision is that jobs must come to talent, instead of the other way round. With a platform like Startcrowd, online learners can find a familiar setting, in which they already excelled. They can make the most of their online education, during which they developed their initiative, self-learning, and self-organization capabilities.

Moreover, online courses remain pretty basic, they rarely go beyond the undergraduate level. After completing these introductory courses, students often ask 'what next’, and they remain clueless. On Startcrowd, they can find research-level projects, providing them with online graduate education.

To get a feel of this job market inefficiency, I launched groups on Facebook and LinkedIn for remote data scientists jobs, and candidates outnumber job postings by several orders of magnitude. So talent shortage in data science may be just a myth.

Startcrowd vs. competitors

A way to better understand the Startcrowd product is to make comparisons with some competitors.

Freelancer
Startcrowd is organized differently from platforms like Freelancer and Upwork. On freelancing platforms, freelancers are not allowed to communicate with each other. They can only communicate with their potential customers. That’s why freelancing often remains confined to small tasks, which can be completed by a single individual. On the other hand, Startcrowd is a complete social network, and startcrowders are encouraged to communicate with each other. Open-source projects invites them to do so. They can build teams, and tackle more ambitious projects.

Moreover, user experience is often poor on those freelancing platforms. Good projects and good freelancers run away from them, resulting in a market for lemons. Startcrowd has the potential to better execute, by being laser-focused on the AI and data science niche.

Github
The first difference is the user interface: Github is made mostly for coders, with a user interface less visual than Startcrowd. A suitable interface is important for different crowds to gather and exchange different skills and tokens.
The second difference is that Github does not seem interested in building a marketplace around repositories. Projects are either free and public, or they live on private repositories invisible to the outside world (Github Enterprise). In all cases, there are no transactions occuring on the Github platform. There are people making money by contributing to Github, but they are doing so out of Github. There’s currently no platform successfully combining Freelancer and Github, and Startcrowd is trying to fill this gap.

Kaggle is mostly known for competitions, which attract lots of participants. A difference is that on Startcrowd, challenge organization is also crowdsourced. Everyone can post a challenge. This should reduce the number of participants per challenge, and thus talent waste. On Kaggle, only a small fraction of submissions contribute to the final solution, the rest is useless.

Moreover, Kaggle competitions are exclusively focused on model building. Startcrowd is involved in the whole product pipeline around data, in order to deliver a sellable product. As a result, it caters to a wider crowd, like product designers and growth hackers.

In a previous post, I elaborated on the differences between Kaggle and Startcrowd. In short, Kaggle is just a game, while Startcrowd aims at being more productive.

Of course, there are many more competitors, I made a longer list on Startcrowd.

Conclusion

A Startcrowd MVP is already launched, where everyone can post and contribute to AI projects. To get the full Startcrowd platform, a blockchain feature remain to be added. This will be done when enough users and crypto-investors will be involved. Startcrowd tokens can be pre-ordered here.

Initially appeared on Medium

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Hello & Cheers!! I'm a content detection and information bot. You are receiving this reply because a short link or links have been detected in your post/comment. The purpose of this message is to inform your readers and yourself about the use of and dangers of short links.

To the readers of the post: Short links are provided by url shortening services. The short links they provide can be useful in some cases. Generally their use is benign. But as with all useful tools there are dangers. Short links can be used to hide all sorts of things. Quite frequently they are used to hide referral links for instance. While not dangerous this can be deceptive. They can also be used to hide dangerous links such as links to phishing sites, sites loaded with malware, scam sites, etc. You should always be extremely cautious before clicking on one. If you don't know and trust the poster don't click. Even if you do you should still be cautious and wary of any site you are sent to. It's always better to visit the site directly and not through a short link.

To the author of the post: While short links may be useful on some sites they are not needed on steemit. You can use markdown to format your links such as this link to steemit. It's as simple as [steemit](https://steemit.com) Unlike short links this allows the reader to see where they are going by simply hovering over the link before they click on it.

This message was created by a bot. It is part of the ongoing fight against spam and phishing attacks on steemit. If you did not use short links in your post and feel you have received this message in error you can contact @fubar-bdhr on discord or @fubar.bdhr on steemit chat to report the issue.

Congratulations @mostafab! You have received a personal award!

1 Year on Steemit
Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.

Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:

The Meet the Steemians Contest is over - Results are coming soon ...

Support SteemitBoard's project! Vote for its witness and get one more award!

Congratulations @mostafab! You received a personal award!

Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 2 years!

You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking

Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!