The world is still divided on the question of voluntary death rights. Legal recognition can start with the use of it's nerve This proposal could not be accepted by many countries of the world. Excerpts are Switzerland only. There is a debate on voluntary deaths in the country, which is a legal matter. The debate added a new dimension. It has been discovered - a sophisticated instrument supported by voluntary donations. Which will cover the cover of the restlessness without any trouble.
This machine is simply called suicide machine. The detector is currently the leader of the Netherlands, Professor Philip Nish, though he has been named as Sarko. This device will be filled with the help of advanced technology.

Even without any problem, the expert said about the device, initially, Professor Nishake. Later explained in detail its effectiveness.
As seen in the picture, its size is like a coffin. Here is the page for the last time, the bed of the dying person. Then the lid of the machine will be closed inside it. After pressing a button, the liquid nitrogen will go out slowly inside the machine. In addition, the amount of oxygen inside the machine will be reduced to 5%. As a result, the person will become unconscious within a minute. He will leave the last breath in the next five minutes. Then the coffin can be separated from the machine, says the professor.
Professor Nishk further said that this suicide machine has been developed with the help of 3D printing technology. As a result, any country in the world will be able to create it with the help of 3D printing. Before that, the family, voluntary people and his physician need to understand the entire operation system, before he is warned.
It is known that this suicides machine can only be affordable in Switzerland. The machine will be available in many clinics in the country. The world will be able to buy it from next year.
Naturally, after the discovery of this suicides machine, Professor Nish faced a serious controversy. Many people are likening it to Hitler with hatred. But he did not see any mistake in his invention. Since 1996, he has been working on the right to voluntary rights. Professor has pledged to continue in the future.
The pitch that this has anything to do with 3D printing is ridiculous on the face of it. If we are to assume that the render presented has any association with the intended design of the machine, then it is no more related to 3D printing than any other machine of the last hundred years for which parts may be produced.
That's a little disingenuous.
Also, the idea that you would need an entire coffin-sized device to pursue what is effectively nitrogen narcosis is ridiculous. The same thing could be achieved far more cheaply and easily with just a mask and gas supplies. Together, the bits to make such a thing might cost as much as $150 USD if you demand quality materials.
The only interesting part of this is the philosophical question of whether a person has the right to self terminate.
That question goes to an even more elemental one: "Who owns you?"
Does the State own you? They seem to have very strong opinions about what you can do with yourself and operate under the essential assumption that they have the complete power to decide that most elemental of thing, whether or not you continue to engage with them.
Does society own you? Are you owned as an effective cog in the larger social machine? Members of society seem quite comfortable telling you what you can and cannot do with your own body, whether or not you agree.
Or do you own you? Are you the ultimate arbiter of your personal experience? If so, then it is certainly within your rights and prerogatives to decide whether you live or you die day-to-day basis.
If the State owes you, it can command you. If society owns you, it can command you. When ownership lies outside of yourself, and you accept that, you have allowed to the tacit understanding that you can be – must be – controlled from beyond your consent.
Sometimes it's really important to ask the question at the root of things.
Who owns you?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@OriginalWorks
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The @OriginalWorks bot has determined this post by @heavenly-ideas to be original material and upvoted(1.5%) it!
To call @OriginalWorks, simply reply to any post with @originalworks or !originalworks in your message!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit