RE: Regime Change Amping Up in Venezuela, with Guaido's 'Tactical Action' and Engineered Power Blackouts

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Regime Change Amping Up in Venezuela, with Guaido's 'Tactical Action' and Engineered Power Blackouts

in deepdives •  6 years ago 

I wouldn't recommend waste your time with baah, he is either a troll or an indoctrinated socialist.

In one comment he says " socialism is the state ownership or control over fundamental sectors of society, such as health, education and utilities." https://steemit.com/deepdives/@baah/baah-re-dedicatedguy-re-baah-baah-re-vieira-re-baah-baah-re-vieira-re-baah-baah-re-funbobby51-re-krnel-regime-change-amping-up-in-venezuela-with-guaido-s-tactical-action-and-engineered-power-blackouts-20190330t025540896z

And then he says "socialism does not mean the state owns or controls the economy" https://steemit.com/deepdives/@baah/baah-re-dedicatedguy-re-baah-baah-re-funbobby51-re-krnel-regime-change-amping-up-in-venezuela-with-guaido-s-tactical-action-and-engineered-power-blackouts-20190330t022542110z

LMAO

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I concur, one of these probably
meme32.jpg

Yes, socialism isn't Totalitarianism like you so quickly slippery sloped from socialism to. Socialism us not complete control of the economy or private enterprise.
Socialism is an extensive welfare, educational, health care, housing and other necessities required for a dignified existence, own and controlled by the state through taxes.

What are you ridiculing exactly? That you think control over basic necessities for a dignified existence is control over the economy? That you cannot have free enterprise and socialism? Ridiculous.

Posted using Partiko Android

Socialism is an extensive welfare, educational, health care, housing and other necessities required for a dignified existence, own and controlled by the state through taxes.

Wrong. Check the definition of socialism, it doesn't even mention those things, it is all about the means of production. You don't even know the definition of socialism.

And socialism is a form of totalitarianism, every socialist country has ended up in totalitarianism.

I don't need to know what the dictionary says about Socialism to know what socialist policy is. The point I want to make is that "all about the means of production" do not mean anything. Which means if production? Educational, medical, housing? How much of the production must be "about it".

Tell me I'm wrong and offer some nonsense "all about the means of production".

No, socialism is not "all about the means of production" and it's not about totalitarian control over the economy.

Yes it is, otherwise it wouldn't be socialism.

What is the difference between capitalism and socialism in your opinion?