North Koreans go to polls in 'rubber-stamp' election
There is one candidate on each ballot for vote held every five years for Supreme People’s Assembly
Agence France-Presse
Sun 10 Mar 2019 07.52 GMT
First published on Sun 10 Mar 2019 05.26 GMT
Shares
180
People inspect the list of voters next to a portrait of the only candidate in North Korea’s legislature election.
People inspect the list of voters next to a portrait of the only candidate in North Korea’s legislature election. Photograph: Dita Alangkara/AP
North Koreans have voted in an election in which there can be only one winner.
Leader Kim Jong-un’s Workers’ party has an iron grip on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea but every five years it holds an election for the rubber-stamp legislature, known as the Supreme People’s Assembly.
There is only one approved name on each ballot paper. Voters have the opportunity to cross it out before casting their ballot, but in practice that is unknown.
Sunday’s voting took place in something of a carnival atmosphere in Pyongyang, with children in red neckerchiefs parading in the streets to encourage voters to attend. Bands played at polling stations, where voters lined up in numerical order according to voter lists displayed for days beforehand.
Turnout the last time was 99.97%, according to the official KCNA news agency – only those who were abroad or “working in oceans” did not take part. And the vote was 100% in favour of the named candidates.
People line up to vote at a polling station in Pyongyang.
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
People line up to vote at a polling station in Pyongyang. Photograph: Dita Alangkara/AP
“We regard all the people in our country as one family so we will unite with one mind and we will vote for the agreed candidate,” the Socialist Women’s Union official Song Yang-ran said ahead of Sunday’s poll. “We acknowledge no one but the Supreme Leader.”
In an article headlined “Superior Election System of DPRK”, KCNA said the vote was an important occasion “displaying the solidity and invincibility of the socialist system in which the leader, the party and the masses form a harmonious whole”.
Famine to feast: North Korean defectors awestruck by food choices in South
Read more
Andrei Lankov, a director at the Korea Risk Group thinktank, said the election was the result of “a need to legitimise the government by simulating democratic procedure”.
Soviet-style communist states had a long tradition of holding general elections, Lankov said, even if the ruling party ignored its own rules about holding regular congresses – something North Korea skipped for more than 30 years.
A ballot in the North Korean election.
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
A ballot in the North Korean election. Photograph: Dita Alangkara/AP
“The early communists sincerely believed that they were producing a democracy the world had never seen, so they needed elections and it became a very important part of self-legitimisation,” he said.
The North is divided into constituencies for the vote. There were 686 at the last election in 2014, when Kim stood in Mount Paektu, a dormant volcano on the border with China revered as the spiritual birthplace of the Korean people. He received a 100% turnout and 100% of the vote, according to KCNA.
Lankov said participation in the poll, like other “obligatory rituals” in the North, does reinforce loyalty to the government and social unity, “because humans love symbolism”.
We made a choice…
… and we want to tell you about it. We made a choice which means our journalism now reaches record numbers around the world and more than a million people have supported our reporting. We continue to face financial challenges but, unlike many news organisations, we have chosen not to put up a paywall. We want our journalism to remain accessible to all, regardless of where they live or what they can afford.
This is The Guardian’s model for open, independent journalism: available for everyone, funded by our readers. We depend on contributions from our readers. Will you support our choice?
Readers’ support powers our work, safeguarding our essential editorial independence. This means the responsibility of protecting independent journalism is shared, enabling us all to feel empowered to bring about real change in the world. Your support gives Guardian journalists the time, space and freedom to report with tenacity and rigour, to shed light where others won’t. It emboldens us to challenge authority and question the status quo. And by keeping all of our journalism free and open to all, we can foster inclusivity, diversity, make space for debate, inspire conversation – so more people have access to accurate information with integrity at its heart.
Guardian journalism is rooted in facts with a progressive perspective on the world. We are editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism is free from commercial bias and not influenced by billionaire owners, politicians or shareholders. No one steers our opinion. At a time when there are so few sources of information you can really trust, this is vital as it enables us to give a voice to those less heard, challenge the powerful and hold them to account. Your support means we can keep investigating and exploring the critical issues of our time.
Our model allows people to support us in a way that works for them. Every time a reader like you makes a contribution to The Guardian, no matter how big or small, it goes directly into funding our journalism. But we need to build on this support for the years ahead.
Source of shared Link
Apologies in advance for the spam, I assure you, it's for a good cause. I gave you a tiny ass vote, you won't notice it, but, I did.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit