Technology and content costs could make ESPN+ an expensive venture, especially when subscribers pay only $5 a month. Here's a breakdown of what it may cost and why it may be more valuable as potential research for Disney.
Source of shared Link
Technology and content costs could make ESPN+ an expensive venture, especially when subscribers pay only $5 a month. Here's a breakdown of what it may cost and why it may be more valuable as potential research for Disney.
Source
Copying/Pasting full or partial texts without adding anything original is frowned upon by the community. Repeated copy/paste posts could be considered spam. Spam is discouraged by the community, and may result in action from the cheetah bot.
More information and tips on sharing content.
If you believe this comment is in error, please contact us in #disputes on Discord
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
$50 Million vs $500 Milion It is a very big hole
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Will people even pay for ESPN? The network has long since declined. With other options out there is this a dying animal. They are going to have to change the delivery format, all media will, but ESPN might be putting good money after bad.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It is probably worth it to spend a lot of money for promo purposes just to hook peoole to get that monthly fee.. that´s a long strategic plan.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit