Who do you think was the richest in human history: Bill Gates or Jenks Khan? Gates is the richest man of our time, but who is the richest person yet in human history?
The answer is complex. It is difficult to compare wealth between different periods of time and different economic systems.
However, Time Magazine, after interviewing historians and economists, ranked the richest 10 people throughout the ages.
Genks Khan, the Emperor of Mongolia, occupied tenth place. He owned the entire empire from China to Europe, and his surplus vine was the key to his influence.
Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, ranked ninth as the richest man in history, having estimated his fortune at about 80 billion dollars.
Eighth was the "Alain Rufus" nephew of the Normandy ruler William the Conqueror in the ninth century. Rufus died with more than $ 100 billion in our time.
In seventh place came John de Rockefeller, who controls 90 percent of US oil production and estimated his fortune in 1918 at $ 1.5 billion.
Andrew Carringi, a Scottish immigrant, sold his company to JPMorgan for $ 372 billion in our time.
The fifth place was Joseph Stalin, whose personal fortune can not be separated from the wealth of the Soviet Union.
The fourth richest man, according to the magazine, is the greatest one, one of India's greatest emperors, and controls an
empire economy that was considered one of the world's largest economies.
China's Emperor Shenzong took third place, which took over tax collection, controlling the world's largest economy at the time.
In second place was Tsar August, who had a fortune now worth about $ 4.6 trillion, and considered Egypt one of his own.
The first, and richest, is Mansa Musa, king of what is now Mali, one of the poorest countries of our time.
But Mali was the biggest producer of gold. It is said about this rich, countless wealth that his generosity caused the collapse of the economy of Egypt during his trip to the pilgrimage, for the large distribution of gold.
Flagged for spamming me the link in steemit.chat DM.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hey. I was also spammed this link by this author on steemchat. But I would request you to not flag a post until it is copied. You can ask the person either to not spam or block them. These guys are new and don't understand the platform yet. Give them time or guidance but please don't flag their efforts.
Just a suggestion. Have a good day @geekpowered.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
New? He first spammed me in January. He's clearly spammed his link to many since then. He should have learned the lesson by now. Maybe he will now, but I still doubt it.
Spam is a universally hated act all over the internet. It is not acceptable to spam links on forums, in e-mail, or anywhere else, such as in a personal, direct message. I didn't have to be told by anyone not to spam. I understood it, because it is universally understood on the internet.
My name in chat specifically says to not DM me, and yet he did, and he spammed me when doing so. He likely didn't even read my name, and simply pasted the URL.
Additionally, the post contains images with no citations, which do appear to be copyright violations, and the post itself looks to be just copypasta.
Any one of these would give me a clear and undeniable reason to flag. If I chose not to flag, which I did the first time, that is my choice. I don't have to let him off with a warning because he is "new".
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit