Lol, I just said that I'm not posting with the reason of self-voting or whatever. If you look at my posts I do deliver quality but if you just wanna bash me thats fine...I don't care. I'm involved even in a local steem meetup group so don't blame me for the things that others are abusing this System. I'm just saying that users like hajin who really don't vote for others are only looking for short term ROI and they still can do it. So Steem should think about some kind of system where even guys like him can get their needs satisfied without posting garbage. But only complain about this people and try to talk moraly wont help anybody here. We need working systems were everybody ia happy and fits into his role.
Posted using Partiko Android
Making everyone happy will lead to making most miserable. Ultimately some derive happiness from others misery, how many are you willing to make miserable to appease them?
If you think I bashed you for vote selling because you're not "all bad" you missed the point. I don't care how much you post and if you don't self vote, if you use your stake to the detriment of the majority, or by selling votes through a proxy, then why should I approve that?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Because not everything is just black and white. Bots do have an important role to play for people who use them wisely. If you want make your good quality post (maybe you have developed an App or Project that needs attention) than you can spent money on Bots to promote your post. That is not a bad thing and if people like me delegate to a Bot I'm loosing out on curation profit. Therefore the Bot pays me some Steem out. And you should also think about whales with 100K SP. If they want to curate their power to 100+ people a day thats not possible. Thats why they need the curation made automatically with a Bot.
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There is already a promote feature which consequently increases the overall value of SBD and STEEM and doesn't conversely devalue the function of Curation.
The part about whales not being able to use their stake is in stark contrast to the reality of delegation, which again invalidates such short sighted mentally.
Ultimately bots are great for only a few things: upvoting malicious flags thus nullifying the abuse, and downvoting any and all accounts that have demonstrated that they don't care for Curation, aka bidbots, and thus nullifying the abuse, and lastly, bots are great when they are used to detect or determine spam and plagiarism.
The problem is that you don't consider that by devaluing the function of Curation by vote selling you are devaluing the inherent value of the platform, or to reward others. If everyone delegated to bid bots there wouldn't be a community anymore, and you cannot escape that simple inconvenient truth.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit