Crossbreeding and extracting is in no way "evil". This discussion is pointless.
RE: Cannabis - To Modify or Not To Modify
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Cannabis - To Modify or Not To Modify
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you'd paid attention you'd see that cross breeding and extraction are not our primary topic, rather it is the standard by which such is conducted, and the lack of standards by corporations whose agenda in monetary profit. Good day to you, sir. Please do find yourself a discussion with a point. lol
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Not the primary topic, but relevant. Can you show me spectrometer readings from trichomes that contain the synthetic nutrients from non-organic growers? Until you can, it's just misguided speculation. In terms of GMO I do not know that it has taken "root" in the industry as of yet.
You mention entheogenic properties...i.e. 'getting high'.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That corporate greed will destroy the quality of a consumable is not speculation whatsoever, as there are more than enough examples across the market of plants of any kind. And No, sir, the term enthogen does not imply getting "high". It implies conscious expansion and shamanistic uses, not the lay persons recreational base consciousness.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit