Google Images
What if your favorite celebrity is not really that person, but an artificially made copy of an imitation? Some things we can say for sure - before anything like this is suggested to the public, as with Dolly, the sheep have been going on for decades. In fact, whistleblowers (the truth you can determine) have said that the first human clone was done in 1938. Donald Marshall tells us that it started at least since the 1960s. Another factor to put in the mix is that the promoters spend tremendous amounts of money on their protogees and an investment of that size should be protected. In that format, cloning, or at least the need for it, is understandable.
I found several video interviews with Donald Marshall where he revealed some interesting points. First there are two different methods used to clone humans ... Replication, in which clones are born after proper pregnancy and Duplication in which people "grow" in a liquid tank within five months. The way they manage it is less important than some other factors, including how clones are controlled and the ethics of cloning humans I will save for the end.
How cloning is done is less important than how clones are controlled afterward - unless it is important to note that they make multiple copies at once. Donald says that many communication-transfer information is done during REM sleep, the deepest part of the sleep cycle. This was done at a "cloning center" that some celebrities have complained about in their music. Another interesting aspect of cloning (this particular type) is that if a clone is injured, say tortured as Donald talks about, the original can feel the pain as well.
Mind control techniques such as disinformation about displacement-concepts such as "astral planes" or "Dimensions 5" to obscure clones and original in an attempt to control their behavior. Also the Illuminati chose their sex slave clones from "catalogs" like high school yearbooks and school photos. "
At the beginning of Part II, Donald mentions that Queen Elizabeth eats people, something that many believe is true. He also mentioned Britney Spears - who he claims cloned himself as a sex slave singing about blowing up cloning centers along with reptiles in his Breaking The Ice song. He goes on to mention that clone behavior can be erratic (something that definitely suits Britney Spears and many other celebs) and should have a "handler" to get out in public. He also mentions "chips" placed in clones ... I assume microchip, because, as he mentioned, the technology is flawed. Just as in nature, "mistakes" occur and the end result is not always as expected. Given that this is an "experiment" organized by the Illuminati, this could explain the impetus behind nanotechnology and transhumanism - "the wave of the future." (There are several videos of Donalds on this site)
As I mentioned, it is the same person behind the cloning that is behind the impetus for nanotechnology, biotechnology, and transhumanism ... the same Technocrats behind the Georgia Guidestones, Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development. Using the same propaganda techniques that the UN uses to sell our bright new "future" (with them at the helm) are the Illuminati political arm ... they push an artificially modified future that will replace "evolutionary inefficiency." This Illuminati driven Brave New World is an even worse nightmare than Donald is talking about. Their methods become more scientific and sophisticated ... and they come out of the closet to talk to their predictive programming. Hollywood comes out with a large number of movies that showcase our future (good and bad). If you listen around the 3:37 mark of the upcoming video they talk about "millions of people on earth." They reached out into the nightmare they had planned for the 95 percent of humanity imagined in Georgia Guidestones.
Jay Myers raises ethical questions about human cloning. Also much of what his video said confirms many of Donald's observations. I believe that Donald, after undergoing a horrendous treatment, explains, from within his own contextual framework - not as a scientist - the same thing discussed in the Jay Myers video. The aspect that needs to be explored is one that seems to actually escape from the scientists involved and something that is not in the Illuminati lexicon-ethics. This is something I've written before ... something I used to talk about in my lecture, What if, for example we clone someone - the most commonly given reason is the "spare part" as Jay says in his video. What we get is human. Man has rights. Humans have feelings, desires and desires, among them the desire to reproduce. Can clones marry? What do you say to your clones when you need a piece? "Sorry, Bob, I'm sure you're a really good guy, but I need your dream." This opens a real worm can. Surely if people make clones, there will be times when they will demand civil rights ... and they are people, how can they be rejected?
Another problem that may be less important is - after the Illuminati scientific plan came into effect, where did it leave Vril? Except for their own purposes, they will not be relevant. The Illuminati might need it now, but once nanotechnology is there, they will become unnecessary - but their tastes will remain ... then what? I think that's a topic for another day.
Please support me @fulltimegeek