RE: About Downvotes | Something that Steem users never accepted

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

About Downvotes | Something that Steem users never accepted

in downvotes •  5 years ago 

The people upset are not upset because of the downvotes, but by the double standards and enforcing of centralization by a stake that was never supposed to get into governance or post payouts. It's not about the downvote, it's about the message a 40million SP account is sending.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Same thing, when the whales used to do it it was centralization of an idea, you see maybe Bitcoin is more or less decentralized they have millions of miners who set the rules, on Steemit it is just one and on Hive it is just a small group of people who pretend it is decentralized.

You don't get the point, it's literally not the same thing, but cba to get deeper into a back and forth that will bring nothing to the table. Research what stinc was supposed to do and what wasn't supposed to do, and you'll understand why stinc downvoting goes against everything stinc and steem stood up for for years.

Te voy a poner el ejemplo de Honduras, el dinero que el gobierno consigue se supone que es para beneficiar al pueblo, esto por supuesto no sucede asi, una parte si se usa para ese fin la mayor parte no algo asi como el ninja mined stake. En cuanto a lo de decentralizacion, si tuvieramos un dictador que solo el decide todo tendriamos a Steemit en el futuro cercano, pero en realidad lo que tenemos es un dictador, un jefe de las fuerzas armadas y una elite de unas 20 familias que deciden todo. Ninguno es decentralizado y las decisiones que se toman no son para el beneficio de la gente sino para beneficiar a este pequeño grupo, algo asi como era Steemit antes, y probablemente como va a ser Hive. Yo estoy en las dos, pero el futuro asi lo miro.