RE: Downvote Control Tool Proposal, smarter downvotes, more options and more !

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Downvote Control Tool Proposal, smarter downvotes, more options and more !

in downvotes •  5 years ago 

Oh nice! You figured out how I'm paying for my curation trail software, a 25% near daily upvote. Tombstone... I don't know why he decided to vote for my software... But the automated votes on that post all come from people who are using my curation trailer. Even with Tombstones vote it's significantly less than $66 a day, and all from people who actively use my software... so get bent. I have asked for significantly more funding to support building trustless third party smart contract platform instead of relying on aggroed inc to hold steemp. People just got upset about bidbots and maybe two people even tried to understand the concept with out leaving some kind of bidbot rage comment. As Steem sinks further in to altcoin hell it's becoming more and more apparent that it's the whales here chasing away developers, investment and clients.

We all know how hard it is to make whales move their votes. As we've seen with witnesses. And the point where I don't want this proposal to be paid is now. And for the whole year.

Your memory is terrible... There are now 27 voters on your proposal and you've exceeded the SP of Steemchillers voters... He has hundreds. Seems like the only people who care about downvote control are relatively massive accounts that would prefer to be involved in curating the least. (MVests)
"@howo": 90716.406,
"@trafalgar": 1794321.422,
"@mys": 11963.657,
"@edriseur": 27621.197,
"@michealb": 318967.139,
"@fredrikaa": 147925.114,
"@fabien": 5849.717,
"@mariuszkarowski": 22518.970,
"@likwid": 0,
"@yusle-alex": 0,
"@barton26": 706.907,
"@dmwh": 16316.516,
"@lemouth": 58295.916,
"@emrebeyler": 67402.748,
"@ausbitbank": 171340.489,
"@scorer": 15327.496,
"@traciyork": 11613.552,
"@enforcer48": 13125.194,
"@blocktrades": 9775949.712,
"@acidyo": 85499.110,
"@theycallmedan": 5266337.890,
"@starkerz": 140873.794,
"@oracle-d": 448344.410,
"@bluerobo": 1821.685,
"@mmmmkkkk311": 282297.899,
"@therealwolf": 1343937.425,
"@jaydih": 1316533.268,
"@stoodkev": 133966.758

66SBD a day is about 10% less than 77SBD a day. And as we have seen above asking for funding is about the daily rate, not the time period asked for... as steemchiller likely won't receive any and you'll likely receive all.

Would you cancel your proposal if I open source coded it all for you? I sure as hell won't be getting any funding from the SPS despite literally inventing ways to distribute software via steem and IPFS, a WYSIWYG VR dApp builder, and having multisignature networks to control funds. So it seems to be around my daily rate of return here anyway, which is Southern California since you asked where I wouldn't take a dev job for less than 2k a week.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
Loading...
Loading...